Skip to main content

Security report for fwb-freising.de

Fort- und Weiterbildung Freising · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fort- und Weiterbildung Freising is a specialized educational provider focused on offering tailored professional development and training services for church employees in Germany. The organization operates a well-structured website featuring comprehensive event listings, speaker profiles, and educational planners, targeting church staff seeking further qualification. The business is positioned as a regional leader in church-related education with a clear focus on quality and relevance. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various JavaScript libraries to enhance user experience and interactivity. The site is mobile-optimized and features good SEO practices, although it lacks explicit CMS identification and some advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks explicit security headers and incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with accessible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, serving its niche audience effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility would further strengthen its position and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fwb-freising.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on church-related professional development. Its business model revolves around organizing events, workshops, and further education programs for church employees. The company has a stable market position within its regional niche, supported by a consistent brand and trust indicators such as testimonials and detailed content. Revenue streams likely derive from event participation fees and educational services. The target audience is clearly defined as church staff in Germany, with a small organizational size and a founding year of 2007. Partnerships include design services and possibly other church-related entities, although no explicit subsidiaries or parent companies are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, suggesting a low immediate risk. The site would benefit from formalizing incident response contacts and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security culture appears basic but adequate for the business type.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit incident response contact information or a security.txt file to improve vulnerability disclosure and response readiness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve usability for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior while maintaining compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fort- und Weiterbildung Freising
Description
Bedarfsorientierte Bildung für kirchliche Mitarbeiter:innen.
Key services
Veranstaltungen (Events), Weiterbildungen (Further education), Bildungsplaner (Educational planner), Newsletter, Referent:innen (Speakers/Instructors)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Awesomplete, WOW.js, Turn.js, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Awesomplete (search enhancement)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on educational services for church employees in Germany.
  3. Comprehensive event listings and speaker information enhance trust.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  6. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Technical stack uses common and modern libraries but lacks explicit CMS identification.
  8. No advertising or tracking networks detected beyond basic marketing tools.
  9. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with phone, email, and physical address.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Awesomplete for enhanced search input, WOW.js for animation effects, and Turn.js for interactive flipbook functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and includes SEO-friendly meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times and script management. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fwb-freising.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fwb-freising.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.