Skip to main content

Security report for futureproductdays.com

Future Product Days · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Future Product Days is a prominent European conference organizer specializing in product design, UX, AI, and digital trends. The event attracts over 2,500 participants including designers, product managers, researchers, AI specialists, and decision-makers. The conference offers a comprehensive program including workshops, tech exhibitions, networking events, and add-on sessions, positioning itself as a leading-edge summit in its sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, it leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, with appropriate consent mechanisms for privacy compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS and captcha protections, though it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, impacting trust and legitimacy assessments. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from improved transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 16 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futureproductdays.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, focusing on event management and knowledge sharing for digital product professionals. Its market position is strong within Europe, supported by partnerships with major brands and organizations. The business model centers on ticket sales, sponsorships, and add-on events. The target audience includes UX professionals, product managers, executives, startups, and investors. The company demonstrates a well-established partnership ecosystem and a clear brand identity. Growth indicators include a large speaker roster and extensive participant engagement. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or WHOIS data limits full business verification.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for form security, indicating a baseline security maturity. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner with granular user controls. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Future Product Days
Description
The international Product Design and UX Conference - 24 & 25 September in Copenhagen. Learn, meet and get inspired at the Future Product Days - the leading-edge summit where designers, product managers, researchers, AI specialists and decision-makers meet.
Key services
Conferences, Workshops, Tech Exhibitions, Networking Events, Add-on Sessions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent banner for cookies and analytics
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for form protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional conference website with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on UX, product management, AI, and e-commerce topics.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with user consent.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies and hosted on Webflow's platform with Cloudflare CDN integration. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, with user consent mechanisms in place. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and performance is fast. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. No broken elements or errors were detected. The technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futureproductdays.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futureproductdays.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.