Skip to main content

Security report for fusp.it

Fondazione Unicampus San Pellegrino · Education · Italy

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondazione Unicampus San Pellegrino is a mature and established educational institution in Italy specializing in linguistic mediation, translation, and intercultural communication. It operates multiple campuses and offers a broad range of academic programs including bachelor's and master's degrees, executive masters, language certifications, and specialized courses. The foundation is accredited by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) and maintains active research centers, positioning itself as a key player in its niche educational market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content tailored to students and professionals in the linguistic field. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress stack with Elementor, WooCommerce, and TutorLMS plugins, supporting e-learning and e-commerce functionalities. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though performance data suggests moderate speed. Security posture is currently weakened by an invalid SSL certificate and lack of support for modern TLS protocols, which undermines HTTPS effectiveness. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with clear contact information and a contact form secured by Google reCAPTCHA. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration and security headers to enhance user trust and data protection. There is no evidence of a formal security policy or incident response contact, which could be areas for future enhancement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fusp.it

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position in the education sector focused on linguistic mediation and translation. Its competitive advantage lies in its accreditation, multiple campuses, and integration of research with education. The business model is primarily academic, offering degree programs and continuing education courses. Revenue streams likely include tuition fees, master programs, and certification courses. The target customers are students, translators, interpreters, and corporate clients seeking language training. The foundation maintains partnerships with other educational institutions and translation networks, enhancing its ecosystem and reach. Growth indicators include recent news, events, and active course offerings. Strategic observations suggest leveraging digital transformation and improving security posture to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but with critical gaps. The invalid SSL certificate and absence of modern TLS support expose users to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and reduce trust in secure communications. The lack of HSTS and OCSP stapling further weakens HTTPS security. No advanced security headers are detected, and no formal security or incident response policies are published. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA, which helps mitigate automated abuse. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for significant improvement in technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Upgrade server configuration to support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols for modern security standards.
  4. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Publish a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FUSP S.r.l.
Registration number
04563820408
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a robust and modern technology stack centered on WordPress with Elementor for page building, WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, and TutorLMS for learning management. The PHP version is 8.1.32, indicating up-to-date backend technology. DNS records show multiple A records and MX records primarily using Google mail servers, indicating reliable email infrastructure. Hosting appears to be with providers related to Technorail and Aruba DNS services. Performance metrics are incomplete but suggest moderate loading times. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection and includes multiple scripts for UI and functionality enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fusp.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fusp.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.