Skip to main content

Security report for fuel.network

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fuel.network presents itself as a technology platform focused on Ethereum layer-2 scaling solutions powered by the FuelVM. The website highlights the launch of Fuel Ignition, targeting Ethereum developers and blockchain users seeking scalable and high-performance rollup solutions. The business model revolves around providing blockchain infrastructure technology, with a focus on home verification and scalability. The site content is professional and well-branded, though lacking detailed business or contact information. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Framer and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, but lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but could be improved by adding security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or unsupported TLD WHOIS, which is common in blockchain domains but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and focused on a niche technology market, but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fuel.network

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Fuel.network as a specialized Ethereum layer-2 rollup provider leveraging the FuelVM technology. The target market includes blockchain developers and enterprises requiring scalable Ethereum solutions. The business model likely involves platform adoption and developer ecosystem growth. The absence of detailed company information, contact data, or certifications suggests an early-stage or stealth mode operation. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS data aligns with blockchain industry norms. The site’s integration with Google Analytics indicates a moderate level of user engagement tracking. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The branding is consistent and focused on technology innovation, but the lack of transparency on business details may impact trust among cautious enterprise clients.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing the attack surface related to user input. The site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. The use of Google Analytics without clear privacy disclosures may expose the site to privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but should be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident reporting channels and data protection officer contacts if applicable.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Increase transparency by publishing business information, certifications, and terms of service to build trust with users and partners.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Fuel Ignition is a high-performance Ethereum layer-2 rollup powered by the FuelVM; built for home verification and scalable for all.
Key services
Ethereum layer-2 rollup, FuelVM powered scalability, Home verification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Analytics, JavaScript
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer framework, which supports modern web design and responsive layouts. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring secure data transmission. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with no major issues noted, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility is basic, with potential for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing and search engine visibility. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features represents technical debt that should be addressed to reduce risk and improve compliance posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 38/100High19 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fuel.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fuel.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.