Skip to main content

Security report for ftec.com.br

Uniftec · Education · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uniftec is a prominent educational institution in Brazil offering a wide range of courses including undergraduate, postgraduate, technical, and extension programs primarily through online and in-person modalities. It operates multiple physical units and polos across Brazil, serving a large student base. The website is built using modern web technologies such as React, Next.js, and Material-UI, hosted on AWS and integrated with VTEX e-commerce platform. Despite a good content quality and user experience, the website suffers from critical security issues including lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of modern TLS protocols, which exposes users to risks. Privacy policies and terms of service are present but basic, and there is no cookie consent mechanism detected. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, with moderate user tracking levels. Overall, the business is well positioned in the education sector in Brazil but needs urgent improvements in security posture to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ftec.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uniftec holds a strong market position as a leading educational provider in the Serra region of Brazil, offering over forty courses across various educational levels. Its business model focuses on accessible education through EAD and physical campuses, targeting students seeking professional development. The institution benefits from a broad partnership ecosystem including related domains for enrollment and specialized education. Revenue streams likely include tuition fees from diverse course offerings. The presence of multiple physical locations and a comprehensive course catalog indicates a large operational scale. The company is part of Grupo Ecoinove, which may provide strategic support and resources. The website's content and branding are consistent, reinforcing its market presence and trustworthiness among prospective students.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are fundamental for secure communications. While SPF and DMARC records are properly configured for email security, the lack of HTTPS exposes users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No formal security policy or incident response information is published, indicating gaps in compliance and readiness. The website does not implement HTTP security headers or HSTS, further weakening its defense. These vulnerabilities could impact business operations by eroding user trust and exposing sensitive data. Compliance with GDPR or similar regulations appears minimal, with only a basic privacy policy present. The security culture and transparency need significant enhancement to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tecbrasil Web Educacional Ltda
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including React, Next.js, and Material-UI, providing a responsive and user-friendly interface. Hosting is managed via Amazon AWS with DNS and mail services integrated with Microsoft Outlook and Amazon SES. The site uses VTEX as its e-commerce platform, indicating a robust backend for course sales and management. Performance metrics indicate slow load times and a large page size, suggesting optimization opportunities. Accessibility and SEO are basic to good, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. The absence of valid SSL and security headers represents a critical technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure is modern but requires security and performance enhancements to ensure reliability and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ftec.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ftec.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.