Skip to main content

Security report for frisuite.ch

Fritic · Education · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Frisuite 4.0 is an educational digital service platform managed by Fritic, targeting schools in the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland. It provides free website hosting, class blogs, and management tools to support digital presence and pedagogical activities. The platform is positioned as a niche regional service supporting educational institutions with tailored digital solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a professional theme and uses modern web technologies including HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages and does not expose contact information on the homepage, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe, with content appropriate for a general audience including students and educators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frisuite.ch

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a public or non-profit educational service provider, offering free digital tools to schools in a specific Swiss canton. Its competitive advantage lies in localized, free, and integrated digital services for education, including website hosting and blog platforms. The target customers are schools, teachers, and students within the canton. The partnership ecosystem includes Friweb and Fritic, which are closely linked and provide complementary services. The business model is service-oriented with no direct monetization visible, focusing on educational support. Growth indicators include planned new platform launches. The company maintains consistent branding and trust signals through official logos and domain registration alignment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner implemented. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. The absence of contact information for security incidents and no security.txt file reduces readiness for incident handling. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to missing privacy policy documentation. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public educational site but could be enhanced with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including a security or abuse email address to facilitate incident reporting and response.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure processes.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fritic
Description
Service offered to all schools in the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland, providing free websites and related digital tools for educational purposes.
Key services
Free website hosting for schools (Friweb), Class blogs for internet presence (Friblog), Management console for site monitoring (Frimanager), Upcoming pedagogical platform hosting (Frihosting)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 5.15.2, Hueman Pro WordPress theme 1.4.29, Cookie Notice plugin 2.5.7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and resource loading)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational service platform for schools in canton Fribourg.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress standard scripts.
  7. Content is bilingual (French and German) targeting local educational institutions.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. No forms present on the homepage; minimal data collection observed.
  10. No social media links found in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using version 6.8.2 and the Hueman Pro theme. It leverages jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements and icons. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses a cookie consent plugin to comply with cookie regulations. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or third-party trackers. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and canonical URLs but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is stable and suitable for the site's educational purpose but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frisuite.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frisuite.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.