Skip to main content

Security report for freespee.com

Kaisa Technologies Limited · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kaisa Technologies Limited operates a sophisticated customer engagement platform designed to enable businesses to create personalized buyer and seller journeys at scale. The company targets sectors such as automotive, marketplaces, and real estate, providing tools for data capture, audience building, engagement automation, and performance optimization. Their platform integrates with leading CRM and CDP systems, supporting enterprise-grade customer experience management. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies like Next.js, HubSpot integrations, and Rive animations, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response details could be improved. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for tech companies, and the domain appears legitimate based on website content and client references. Overall, Kaisa presents as a credible, professional SaaS provider with a strong market position in scalable customer engagement solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching freespee.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kaisa is positioned as a B2B SaaS provider focusing on high-consideration purchase journeys, especially in automotive and marketplace verticals. Their competitive advantage lies in deep data integration and personalized engagement automation. The presence of major clients like Toyota, Škoda, eBay, and Gumtree indicates strong market traction. The business model relies on platform subscriptions and developer integrations, supported by comprehensive documentation and developer tools. Growth indicators include a well-maintained resource hub, active social media presence, and continuous content updates. Partnerships with Freespee-related domains suggest an ecosystem approach. Strategic observations highlight the importance of expanding security transparency and incident response readiness to enhance trust further.

Security posture

Kaisa demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent, and a dedicated security & compliance page. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy represent areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The company should consider publishing security certifications and establishing clear security contact channels to strengthen incident response readiness and customer trust. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Create and publicly share an incident response plan and security contact information to improve transparency and customer confidence.
  3. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Obtain and display recognized security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to reinforce enterprise-grade security claims.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to minimize risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kaisa Technologies Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kaisa Technologies Limited
Description
Kaisa helps you leverage data to keep buyers and sellers engaged through highly personalized customer experiences at scale.
Key services
Customer engagement platform, Data capture and integration, Audience building, Personalized engagement automation, Performance improvement and KPI tracking, CRM and CDP integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Rive animations, SVG and PNG images
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
HubSpot, Google Analytics, Identity Digital (domain registrar)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Enterprise-grade security & compliance page

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong focus on automotive and marketplace sectors.
  4. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trust.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No direct company emails found in HTML; contact via forms and phone.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js for server-side rendering and React-based UI components. Integration with HubSpot for marketing automation and Google Tag Manager for analytics indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting on WP Engine suggests reliable performance and scalability. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and structured content. Use of Rive animations and SVG assets enhances visual appeal without compromising performance. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable platform suitable for enterprise clients.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with freespee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review freespee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.