Skip to main content

Security report for fraudblocker.com

Fraud Blocker · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fraud Blocker is a small technology company specializing in click fraud protection software designed to save advertisers money by blocking fraudulent clicks on Google Ads. The company positions itself as a leading provider in this niche, targeting advertisers and digital marketing agencies seeking to improve ad campaign efficiency. Founded in 2019, the business leverages a SaaS model to deliver proprietary fraud detection technology. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear messaging focused on its core services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme and Elementor page builder, incorporating modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager. Hosting and DNS services involve Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain registration locked against unauthorized changes, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. From a security and compliance perspective, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts privacy compliance scores. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and no data protection officer contact is provided. Contact information is clearly available, including a company email and phone number, along with active social media profiles. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy, with no adult or questionable content detected. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve privacy compliance by publishing policies and implementing cookie consent, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security and incident response documentation to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fraudblocker.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
72
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fraud Blocker operates in the digital advertising technology sector, focusing on click fraud detection and prevention. Its competitive advantage lies in proprietary software that claims to improve advertising results by nearly 30%. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting advertisers and agencies using Google Ads. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for software usage. The company maintains a small team and a consistent brand presence across social media platforms. Market positioning as a leading click fraud protection provider suggests a niche specialization with potential for growth. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but external links indicate integration with major ad and analytics platforms. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced compliance documentation and security transparency to support scaling and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration is protected with multiple client prohibitions, reducing risk of hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a missed opportunity for DNS security enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response policy indicates limited formalized security governance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party tracking pixels and analytics is standard but requires transparent user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formal policies and improved DNS security. Business impact of current gaps is moderate, primarily related to compliance and trust rather than immediate technical vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the website, including GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fraud Blocker
Description
Save money by blocking click fraud on Google Ads using Fraud Blocker's best-in-class fraud detection software.
Key services
Click fraud detection, Click fraud blocking, Google Ads fraud protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain locked with multiple client prohibitions
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage or in metadata.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone number.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices is evident.
  5. Social media presence is established with Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube links.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No data protection officer contact or incident response policy found.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on click fraud protection software.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the GeneratePress theme and Elementor page builder, which supports responsive design and SEO optimization. The tech stack includes Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. Hosting and DNS services leverage Cloudflare for performance and security benefits. Performance is moderate with preloading and caching optimizations observed. Accessibility features are basic but functional. The site uses multiple external scripts for tracking and marketing, including Facebook and Reddit pixels, which require proper privacy management. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing formal security documentation. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance compliance to support business growth and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fraudblocker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fraudblocker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.