Skip to main content

Security report for fraq-sup.fr

reseaufraqsup · Education · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.fraq-sup.fr represents a francophone network focused on quality assurance agencies in higher education. It serves as a niche platform for educational quality stakeholders primarily in France and other French-speaking regions. The site is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's CMS and associated technologies, including Sentry for error monitoring and Wix InstantSearchPlus for search functionality. The technical infrastructure is modern and benefits from Wix's hosting and performance optimizations, with good mobile responsiveness and basic SEO features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs some JavaScript-based security hardening techniques. However, it lacks explicit security headers and visible security or privacy policies, which could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust, although the website content and structure appear professional and relevant to its educational mission. Overall, the site is functional and serves its target audience adequately but would benefit from enhanced transparency regarding privacy, security policies, and contact information to improve trust and compliance. The domain's registration status should be clarified to ensure long-term legitimacy and operational continuity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fraq-sup.fr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a specialized segment within the education sector, focusing on quality assurance in higher education for francophone agencies. Its business model appears to be that of a non-profit or collaborative network, facilitating information exchange and support among member agencies. The site does not display commercial activities or monetization features, indicating a focus on community and professional networking. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper business intelligence insights. The platform's use of Wix suggests a small to medium-sized organization with limited technical resources but a need for an accessible web presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and some client-side security hardening is in place via JavaScript overrides to restrict certain fetch and XMLHttpRequest behaviors. The site uses Sentry for monitoring errors, which aids in proactive issue detection. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers (such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of visible security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the site is not exposed to obvious vulnerabilities but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident communications.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
reseaufraqsup
Description
Réseau francophone des agences qualité pour l'enseignement supérieur
Key services
Networking of quality assurance agencies, Information sharing, Support for quality assurance in higher education
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Sentry (error monitoring), core-js polyfills, Focus-within polyfill, Wix InstantSearchPlus widget
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security override globals to harden fetch and XMLHttpRequest
  • Cookie handling restrictions for sensitive cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix technologies and widgets.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Website content is in French and targets francophone higher education quality assurance agencies.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. Security best practices partially implemented but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's proprietary CMS and hosting infrastructure. It includes modern JavaScript polyfills and error monitoring via Sentry. The site uses Wix InstantSearchPlus for enhanced search capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with canonical tags and Open Graph metadata present but no advanced SEO schema beyond a simple WebSite JSON-LD. The site lacks custom frameworks or backend technologies visible from the front-end. Technical debt appears low due to Wix's managed environment, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fraq-sup.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fraq-sup.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.