Skip to main content

Security report for frameworks.no

Frameworks AS · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Frameworks AS is a Norwegian web agency established in 2003, specializing in web design, development, SEO, and maintenance services primarily for businesses in the Agder region and across Norway. The company offers services including website and app development, site maintenance, and search engine optimization, leveraging platforms like WordPress and Umbraco. Their market position is that of a trusted local and national partner with a strong focus on performance, usability, and client satisfaction. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, supported by modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools like Plausible Analytics. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and multiple security headers implemented, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are missing, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frameworks.no

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Frameworks AS operates as a service provider in the technology sector, focusing on web solutions for businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering fast, clean-coded websites with SEO and GEO optimization, supported by client testimonials and case studies. The business model is project and service-based, targeting small to medium enterprises seeking efficient and effective web presence improvements. The company maintains partnerships with several regional organizations and clients, enhancing its ecosystem and market reach. Growth indicators include a long-established domain, positive reviews, and a portfolio of diverse projects. Strategic observations suggest a strong local presence with potential for expanded national influence through digital marketing and SEO.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in formal security governance and transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through contact information but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The use of modern CMS and plugins requires ongoing vigilance to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving user privacy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Develop and make publicly available security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to ensure compliance with universal design standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Frameworks AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Frameworks AS
Description
Webdesign, webutvikling, nettbutikk, WordPress, Umbraco, SEO, AIO, GEO for kunder i hele Norge. Kontor i Arendal.
Key services
Utvikling av nettsider og apper, Drift og vedlikehold av nettsider og apper, Søkemotoroptimalisering (SEO og AIO)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Cloudflare (implied by Cloudflare headers), Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong local and national business focus in Norway
  3. Good use of structured data for SEO and business information
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
  8. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  9. Client testimonials and case studies enhance trust
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It employs jQuery and other standard JavaScript libraries, with performance optimized through Cloudflare CDN and image preloading. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML and schema.org structured data for SEO benefits. Technical debt appears minimal, with clean code and good use of caching and analytics. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or headless CMS approaches, but current infrastructure supports stable and performant operations with low technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frameworks.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frameworks.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.