Skip to main content

Security report for framerbite.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FramerBite is a small technology-focused business specializing in providing premium website templates for the Framer platform. Their market position is niche, targeting web designers and developers who want to build and ship modern websites quickly using Framer templates. The website is professionally designed with good content relevance and clear navigation, hosted on Framer's infrastructure with HTTPS and modern web technologies. The technical infrastructure includes multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Intercom live chat, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks advanced security headers and publicly disclosed security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected. The domain uses privacy protection which is typical for small businesses in this sector. Strategic improvements in privacy disclosures and security best practices are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching framerbite.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FramerBite operates in the technology sector, specifically in the web design and development niche by selling premium Framer templates. Their business model is e-commerce focused on digital product sales. The target customers are web designers, developers, and digital creators using the Framer platform. The company appears to be small in size with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, but lack explicit trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests an active approach to customer engagement and growth. No direct contact information or detailed company registration data is publicly available, which may limit business credibility perception.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern security practices such as no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options which could improve protection against common web attacks. The presence of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular auditing to avoid vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is disclosed, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Privacy compliance is insufficient with no privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better policy disclosures and security header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Disclose incident response and security policies to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Explore premium Framer Templates to build & ship modern websites fast in Framer. Take your websites to the next level now!
Key services
premium Framer templates, website building resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Intercom Live Chat, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche e-commerce platform selling Framer templates.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  3. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  5. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed.
  6. Website is hosted on Framer's platform with HTTPS and modern fonts.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging its hosting and design capabilities. It uses modern web fonts and a responsive design approach ensuring good mobile optimization. The inclusion of Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Intercom indicates a mature marketing and analytics setup. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. No CMS other than Framer is detected. Hosting is via Framerusercontent.com, a specialized hosting for Framer sites. Technical debt appears low but the site would benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with framerbite.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review framerbite.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.