Skip to main content

Security report for framer.website

Framer · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Framer is a technology company offering a no-code website builder platform that enables designers and teams to create professional, fully custom websites with integrated CMS, SEO, and real-time collaboration features. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including Framer's own framework, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. Despite the professional presentation and rich content, the WHOIS data for the domain www.framer.com is missing or inaccessible, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe for general audiences but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching framer.website

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Framer positions itself strongly in the no-code website builder market, targeting designers and high-performing teams seeking design freedom and collaboration. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering tools that combine design, CMS, and SEO capabilities. The company appears to have a large user base and a strong brand presence, supported by excellent website quality and user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit contact or compliance information may impact trust for some users. The company could enhance its market position by adding clear privacy, security, and incident response information to build further confidence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics and tracking tools, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies suggest gaps in security best practices and compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data also reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and vulnerability disclosures, including a security.txt file.
  4. Resolve WHOIS data visibility issues to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Framer
Description
Build a free website with Framer—enjoy full design freedom, powerful CMS, built-in SEO, and real-time collaboration. Create professional, fully custom sites with the no-code builder loved by designers and high-performing teams.
Key services
No-code website builder, CMS, SEO tools, Real-time collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Custom Framer scripts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (ID present but empty)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and lowers trust score.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools like Hotjar and Google Analytics.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information detected.
  7. No incident response or security contact information found.
  8. No certifications or compliance badges visible.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform with extensive use of JavaScript and modern web fonts. It integrates third-party analytics and user behavior tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of structured data for business or contact information are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and performant but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with framer.website. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review framer.website.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.