Skip to main content

Security report for foxscot.ch

Foxscotch · Technology · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foxscotch is a personal website representing an individual web developer who also enjoys programming, 3D modeling, and animals. The site serves primarily as a personal portfolio and social media hub, linking to various social platforms. The business model is personal branding with a focus on web development services. The website is simple, clean, and consistent in branding but lacks formal business information or policies. Technically, the site uses standard HTML and CSS with FontAwesome icons, but no advanced frameworks or CMS are detected. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility and SEO are basic. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy policies. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting business functionality. Overall, the site is safe and suitable for general audiences with no adult content or tracking technologies detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foxscot.ch

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a general audience interested in personal content and social media interaction. It does not represent a commercial enterprise but rather an individual’s personal brand. There are no indications of revenue streams or partnerships. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its personal touch and direct social media engagement. Growth indicators or market positioning are not applicable. The absence of formal business information or certifications limits credibility in a commercial context. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms and art contributors acknowledged on the site.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The site lacks HTTPS confirmation in the provided data, no security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. There is no incident response information or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The absence of forms reduces risk but also limits interaction. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not demonstrated. The security culture appears minimal, appropriate for a personal site but insufficient for commercial operations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS and ensure SSL/TLS certificates are properly configured.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foxscotch
Description
Personal website of Foxscotch, a web developer who enjoys programming, 3D modeling, and animals, especially cats and insects.
Key services
web development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio and social hub for Foxscotch, a web developer.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  6. Social media presence is strong with multiple external links.
  7. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No CMS or hosting provider information detected.
  10. Website is simple, clean, and consistent in branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML5, CSS3, and FontAwesome icons. No CMS or JavaScript frameworks are detected, indicating low complexity and minimal technical debt. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with some meta tags and Open Graph tags present. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. The site could benefit from modernization including improved accessibility, SEO, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foxscot.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foxscot.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.