Skip to main content

Security report for foxodev.com

Foxo Development · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foxo Development is a small international IT services company founded in 2020, specializing in digital product development including CRM systems, mobile applications, web development, and digital solutions for startups and enterprises. The company operates primarily in European markets including the UK and Poland, with a professional online presence and clear service offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The security posture is solid with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, enhancing trust. Overall, the site reflects a credible and professional business with moderate to good technical maturity and security awareness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foxodev.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Foxo Development targets business clients needing custom IT solutions, leveraging a service-based business model focused on software and mobile app development. Their market positioning is as a reliable, small-sized technology provider with a growing international footprint. The company benefits from partnerships such as FoxoMed for medical consulting services. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and digital tool integrations. The website content and social media presence support a professional brand image aimed at startups and enterprises. Growth indicators include multi-country offices and a diverse service portfolio. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding security certifications and incident response capabilities to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protecting forms against spam. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be a compliance gap. Data protection practices are supported by a detailed privacy policy aligned with GDPR. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT company but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Foxo Development
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foxo Development
Description
We develop digital products for business. Development of crm systems, mobile applications, web development, ready-made digital solutions for startups and enterprises.
Key services
Web Development, Mobile Development, UX/UI Design, Software Development, Digital Tools for Business Growth
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Fancybox, WOW.js, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS (mentioned in services)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional IT development company site targeting European markets
  2. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  3. Includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple contact forms
  6. No explicit security headers detected, DNSSEC not enabled
  7. Domain registration is consistent and appropriate for business age
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, WOW.js for animations, Slick carousel, and Fancybox for UI components. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for spam protection on forms. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, providing some CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks. The infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foxodev.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foxodev.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.