Skip to main content

Security report for foundationfortulsaschools.org

Foundation for Tulsa Schools · Education · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foundation for Tulsa Schools is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Tulsa Public Schools through fundraising, grants, and community partnerships. The organization focuses on providing academic resources, financial support, and teacher retention programs to strengthen the local education system. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, detailed program information, and active engagement with donors and partners. The Foundation leverages popular web technologies including WordPress, Elementor, and Gravity Forms to deliver a user-friendly experience. Social media integration and structured data enhance their outreach and SEO effectiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place; however, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is a notable gap, as no privacy or cookie policies are present, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its community-focused mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foundationfortulsaschools.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools operates in the education and non-profit sectors, targeting students, educators, parents, and community donors in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Founded in 2002, it has built a strong local presence with a medium-sized organizational footprint. Revenue streams primarily come from donations, sponsorships, and fundraising events, supported by partnerships with local businesses and organizations. The Foundation's competitive advantage lies in its long-standing community relationships and focused mission on teacher support and student resources. The website's detailed donor acknowledgments and partner highlights reinforce credibility and encourage continued engagement. Growth indicators include increased novice teacher retention and expanding grant opportunities. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors like DonorPerfect and hosting services, which are critical for operational efficiency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections enabled. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduce the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness in case of security incidents. The use of popular and regularly updated plugins like Gravity Forms and Elementor is positive, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities is essential. Privacy compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies, present regulatory risks especially under GDPR and similar frameworks. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to align with best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to secure domain name resolution and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Establish and display a security incident response policy and contact information.
  5. Regularly audit and update all CMS components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foundation for Tulsa Schools
Description
Building a better community by providing excellent academic resources and financial support for all Tulsa Public School students
Key services
Grant funding for educators, Teacher support programs, Community partnership initiatives, Student and parent resources, Fundraising events and sponsorships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.15, Elementor and Elementor Pro, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established non-profit focused on education support in Tulsa
  2. Content is rich with detailed information about programs, donors, and partnerships
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  4. Uses modern web technologies and popular WordPress plugins
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, address, and newsletter form
  7. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.15 using Elementor and Elementor Pro for page building, supported by jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Gravity Forms is used for data collection via newsletter signup. The site integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting appears to be managed via Network Solutions with custom nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include outdated WordPress version (5.7.15 is not the latest), missing DNSSEC, and lack of security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security and privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and regulatory exposure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foundationfortulsaschools.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foundationfortulsaschools.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.