Skip to main content

Security report for forumwerteorientierung.de

Forum Werteorientierung in der Weiterbildung e. V. · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Forum Werteorientierung in der Weiterbildung e. V. is a German non-profit organization dedicated to promoting ethical and value-oriented practices in the continuing education sector. The organization provides a quality seal and a professional code of conduct to its member organizations, aiming to enhance transparency and integrity in the education market. The website serves as an informational platform showcasing members, partners, sponsors, and providing updates on seminars and news relevant to the sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel, hosted on rzone.de servers. It demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy regulations, though it could improve in security policy transparency and technical security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forumwerteorientierung.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche position in the German continuing education market as a non-profit entity focused on ethical standards and transparency. Its business model revolves around membership and partnership with education providers who commit to a code of conduct and quality seal. The website highlights a network of member organizations and partners, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and sponsorships. The target audience includes education professionals and organizations seeking credibility and ethical certification. The presence of multiple partner logos and sponsors suggests active engagement and recognition in the sector. Growth potential lies in expanding membership and increasing awareness of the quality seal. The website content and structure support these strategic goals effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. A cookie consent mechanism is present, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder effective handling of security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to mitigate risks. Overall, the site is secure enough for its informational purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing more detailed information on data processing and retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Forum Werteorientierung in der Weiterbildung e. V.
Description
The Forum Werteorientierung in der Weiterbildung e. V. is a non-profit organization promoting responsible and value-oriented conduct in the continuing education sector. It provides a quality seal and a professional code of conduct for its member organizations to ensure ethical standards in education.
Key services
Issuing quality seal 'Qualität – Transparenz – Integrität', Maintaining a professional code of conduct, Providing a platform for member organizations, Offering seminars and news updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.12, jQuery 3.6.0, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit organization site focused on education and ethical standards.
  2. Content is in German with clear navigation and multiple pages for members, partners, and sponsors.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with a visible banner.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via contact page.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond basic cookie notice and privacy page.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and plugin scripts.
  8. Multiple logos of member organizations and partners displayed with links.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.12, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery 3.6.0, Owl Carousel for logo sliders, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The hosting provider is identified via nameservers as rzone.de, a known German hosting service. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags and canonical links. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies are detected. The technical setup is typical for a small non-profit organization website, with opportunities for modernization and security hardening to improve resilience and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forumwerteorientierung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forumwerteorientierung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.