Skip to main content

Security report for forpsicloud.cz

FORPSI Cloud · Technology · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FORPSI Cloud is a Czech-based cloud computing service provider offering reliable, secure, and scalable cloud solutions targeted at businesses and IT professionals. The website positions the company as a cost-effective and trustworthy cloud services provider in the Czech and Slovak markets. The digital infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries, Kentico CMS, and integration with major analytics and marketing platforms such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and slightly impacts trust, but the professional website and compliance measures mitigate this concern. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly found, which could be improved to enhance business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forpsicloud.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forpsicloud.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
911
Employees
0
Customers
911
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

32 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for forpsicloud.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FORPSI Cloud operates in the technology sector focusing on cloud computing services. Its business model revolves around providing scalable cloud infrastructure solutions with a strong emphasis on security and compliance. The company leverages partnerships with Forpsi domains and uses third-party services for analytics and marketing. The target audience includes businesses requiring cloud hosting and computing solutions. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality. The lack of visible contact information and WHOIS transparency are areas for potential improvement. The company appears to maintain a good market position in the Czech Republic with expansion into Slovakia.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Session and CSRF protection cookies are used, indicating attention to secure session management. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional header implementations and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add clear company contact information such as support emails and phone numbers on the website to increase business credibility.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FORPSI Cloud
Description
FORPSI Cloud offers reliable, secure, and easily scalable cloud computing solutions with the best price-quality ratio on the market.
Key services
Cloud computing, Cloudové služby, Scalable cloud solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • CSRF protection cookies (CMSCsrfCookie)
  • Session management cookies with HttpOnly and Secure flags (inferred)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik Analytics (Matomo)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
CrazyEgg, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registration issues.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present, indicating GDPR compliance.
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with transparent consent.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage HTML.
  6. Site uses Kentico CMS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No visible security certifications or incident response information.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js for UI components, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The CMS appears to be Kentico, inferred from URL paths and script locations. Hosting is likely provided by Forpsi or Aruba, based on cookie domains and privacy policy links. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site is well-structured with consistent branding and good content quality, though some technical SEO and accessibility improvements are possible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forpsicloud.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forpsicloud.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.