Skip to main content

Security report for formpipe.com

Formpipe Software AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Formpipe Software AB is a well-established technology company specializing in premium business software solutions tailored for mid-sized to large companies and public organizations, primarily in the banking and public sectors. Their offerings include document composition (Lasernet), digital preservation, and ERP solutions, positioning them as a key player in digital transformation and data relationship management. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and multilingual support, targeting professional audiences in Sweden, Denmark, Germany, UK, and the USA. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Flickity, GSAP, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for consent management, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure with Episerver CMS. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. The site integrates extensive analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Matomo, Microsoft Dynamics Marketing, and social media pixels, indicating a sophisticated approach to user tracking and marketing. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, use of anti-CSRF tokens, and reCAPTCHA on forms. However, explicit security headers are not clearly documented and no public security or incident response policies were found. Privacy compliance is robust with GDPR-aligned privacy and cookie policies, and a clear consent mechanism. Contact information is comprehensive, including multiple international offices, emails, and phone numbers. Overall, Formpipe demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, with minor areas for improvement in security header implementation and accessibility. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching formpipe.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Formpipe operates in the technology sector with a focus on software solutions for banking and public sectors. Their business model centers on providing enterprise-grade software products and services that facilitate digital transformation, document management, and ERP integration. The company targets mid-sized to large organizations and public institutions, leveraging partnerships and a global presence with offices in Europe and the USA. Their market position is strengthened by specialized products like Lasernet and integration with Microsoft Dynamics 365. The website content and investor relations indicate a mature company with ongoing growth and a strong partnership ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, support, and consulting services.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Anti-CSRF tokens are implemented via cookies. Cookie consent is managed through Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly visible in the provided data, representing an area for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could benefit from formalized policies and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and document comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Optimize website performance further to improve loading times and user experience, especially on mobile devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Formpipe Software AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Formpipe Software AB
Description
Premium business software for mid-sized to large companies and public organizations wanting to excel in the digital era.
Key services
Lasernet document composition, Digital preservation, ERP solutions, Banking software, Public sector software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Flickity carousel, GSAP animation, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot consent management, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Dynamics tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Anti-CSRF cookie (.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.#)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Microsoft Dynamics Marketing
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, adnxs, Microsoft Dynamics Marketing, LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot pixel, Facebook pixel, LinkedIn pixel, Matomo
Marketing tools
Google AdSense, LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads, Microsoft Dynamics Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  2. Multiple contact methods and physical addresses provided.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. Strong presence in banking and public sector software markets.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring jQuery, Flickity for carousels, GSAP for animations, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Cookiebot is used for consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The CMS appears to be Episerver, a robust enterprise CMS platform. Hosting is likely on Microsoft Azure, inferred from Azure-related cookies and privacy links. The site includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Some technical debt may exist due to multiple third-party scripts and potential lack of explicit security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize accessibility features and improve SEO further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with formpipe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review formpipe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.