Skip to main content

Security report for forgd.com

Forgd · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Forgd is a technology company specializing in blockchain capital markets advisory and Web3 tools. The company offers a suite of free self-service tools and bespoke advisory services aimed at blockchain projects, market makers, exchanges, and Web3 advisory firms. Their platform supports tokenomics design, market maker engagement, exchange listing research, liquidity monitoring, token unlock tracking, and cap table management. Forgd is positioned as a trusted partner in the blockchain ecosystem, evidenced by media features and partnerships with leading projects and exchanges. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare Turnstile for bot protection. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. Analytics tools are integrated for user behavior tracking, though some are commented out. The site uses HTTPS and multimedia content effectively to engage users. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and CAPTCHA mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and external validations mitigate this risk. Overall, Forgd presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security transparency, and domain registration clarity are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: xqpsgz7df67hakwjtlrnuynie2qr3h5sycbqbjnzvrnpcpuvgtga.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forgd.com

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Forgd operates in the blockchain technology sector, targeting blockchain projects at various stages, market makers, and advisory firms. Their competitive advantage lies in combining proprietary data, in-house software, and deep advisory expertise to deliver comprehensive token launch and optimization solutions. The business model includes free tools to attract users and paid bespoke advisory services. Forgd's partnerships and media presence indicate a growing ecosystem influence. Revenue streams likely include advisory fees and potential premium tool features. The company emphasizes transparency, data-driven decision making, and operational support, positioning itself as a key enabler in the Web3 capital markets landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No publicly available privacy or cookie policies limit GDPR compliance visibility. Lack of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a public-facing advisory platform but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and response.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible security research.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Forgd
Description
Forgd provides blockchain projects with free tools and solutions for token launch and protocol optimization—all in a single platform.
Key services
Tokenomics design, Market maker engagement, Exchange listing research, Liquidity monitoring, Token unlock monitoring, Cap table management, Advisory services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare Turnstile (captcha), PostHog (commented out), Lottie animations, HTML5 video, CSS3 animations
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cloudflare Turnstile captcha integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog (commented out), Nocodelytics (commented out)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog (commented out), Nocodelytics (commented out)
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main pages
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  4. Strong branding and consistent design throughout site
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  7. WHOIS data missing, raising some legitimacy questions
  8. Social media presence on Twitter (X), LinkedIn, YouTube
  9. Multiple free tools offered for blockchain projects and market makers
  10. Advisory services offered with application forms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 animations, and Lottie for interactive elements. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, with optional PostHog and Nocodelytics scripts commented out. Hosting appears to be via Webflow with Cloudflare CDN and security services. The site is optimized for fast loading, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. Video content is used effectively for engagement. However, the lack of explicit security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forgd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forgd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.