Skip to main content

Security report for foresee.com

Verint · Technology · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

91/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Verint is a well-established enterprise technology company specializing in customer engagement and predictive analytics solutions. Their website showcases a mature digital presence with a focus on delivering insights into customer behavior and experience management. The company targets large organizations seeking advanced analytics to improve customer interactions and business outcomes. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tracking and optimization tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer, indicating a commitment to data-driven marketing and performance optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, reflecting good security hygiene. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy and incident response contact points to areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though the lack of WHOIS data slightly reduces domain trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 45 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching foresee.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
91

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention foresee.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
262
Employees
0
Customers
206
Third parties
56
Weak passwords
24%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for foresee.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Verint holds a strong market position as a leader in customer engagement technology, offering predictive modeling and voice of the customer analytics. Their business model is B2B, focusing on enterprise clients across various industries. The company leverages certifications like ISO 27001 to bolster trust and compliance. Their digital ecosystem includes active social media channels and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, supporting regulatory compliance and customer trust. The website content is targeted at decision-makers and analysts interested in customer experience solutions, with clear calls to action and detailed product information. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but offset by the company's visible market presence and branding consistency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact user confidence in security incident handling. The use of third-party scripts like VWO and Google Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance documentation and vulnerability disclosure programs.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Verint Systems Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Verint
Description
Verint provides predictive analytics solutions that offer insights into consumer visits, industry sectors, and roles within companies to enhance customer experience management.
Key services
Predictive analytics, Customer experience management, Voice of the Customer solutions, Experience management platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), jQuery, WordPress CMS, CDN usage (cookielaw.org, googletagmanager.com)
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
VWO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on customer experience analytics and predictive modeling
  3. Use of modern tracking and optimization tools
  4. No signs of malicious or adult content
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or registry issues
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms in place
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found publicly
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and third-party tools like Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and optimization. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs and implements structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in load times and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. The technical infrastructure supports a professional digital presence but would benefit from continuous performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 91/100Low19 findingsView report
  2. 91/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foresee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foresee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.