Skip to main content

Security report for forenose.com

天津市前嗅网络科技有限公司 · Technology · China

Partial score · DNS & email only

48/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

天津市前嗅网络科技有限公司 operates the website forenose.com, a professional big data and AI technology service provider based in China. The company offers a comprehensive suite of products and solutions including data collection engines (ForeSpider), natural language processing, intelligent analysis, distributed storage, and industry-specific research reports. Their target audience primarily consists of enterprise clients, data analysts, and industry researchers seeking advanced data mining and analysis capabilities. The company has a medium-sized market presence with a focus on original technology development and application in the AI and big data sectors. Technically, the website is custom-built and leverages common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, consistent with the domain registration data. The site performs moderately in terms of performance and mobile optimization, with basic SEO and accessibility features. The content is well-structured and professionally presented, supporting a good user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which could expose it to certain risks. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy and security policies, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which may affect trust from security-conscious clients. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with a solid business foundation and clear contact information. However, improvements in security hardening, privacy compliance, and transparency around security policies are recommended to enhance the security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forenose.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized provider of big data and AI solutions with a broad product portfolio and industry-specific applications. Their business model combines software product sales, custom data collection services, and intelligent data analysis solutions. The presence of multiple external partner domains related to proxy and IP services suggests a strong ecosystem supporting their data collection capabilities. The company has been operational since 2013, indicating stability and experience. The website content and structure reflect a focus on enterprise clients and professional users, with detailed descriptions of products and solutions enhancing credibility. The lack of explicit certifications or security policies may be a competitive disadvantage in highly regulated markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced DNS security (DNSSEC) and critical HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. Forms for login and registration are present but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are evident beyond basic image and SMS verification. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates potential regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a security audit of all forms and authentication mechanisms to ensure protection against common vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
天津市前嗅网络科技有限公司
Description
前嗅提供ForeSpider爬虫数据采集、数据挖掘、数据分析、知析标讯等大数据一整套解决方案，专注于人工智能和大数据领域的原创技术开发与应用。
Key services
数据采集引擎ForeSpider, 自然语言处理, 智能分析系统, 大数据底层技术产品, 定制采集服务, 数据可视化, 行业研究报告
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, slides.min.jquery.js, superslide.js, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, Gooeymenu.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional big data and AI technology service provider based in China.
  2. Content is comprehensive with detailed product and solution descriptions.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, and security headers not detected, suggesting room for security improvements.
  7. Website uses multiple external domains mainly for proxy and IP services partnerships.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built CMS with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap for UI and interaction. Hosting is on Alibaba Cloud, consistent with the domain registrar. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD detected. Accessibility features are minimal. The site integrates multiple external domains mainly for proxy and IP services, indicating a complex ecosystem supporting data collection. There is no evidence of modern frontend frameworks or advanced performance optimization techniques. Technical debt appears moderate with opportunities for modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forenose.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forenose.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.