Skip to main content

Security report for force.com

Salesforce · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Salesforce is a leading enterprise cloud computing company specializing in CRM and application development platforms. Their Salesforce Platform integrates data, AI, CRM, development, and security into a unified solution targeting businesses and developers globally. The company holds a strong market position as a pioneer and leader in cloud-based enterprise software, supported by a broad portfolio including MuleSoft, Tableau, and Slack. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, professional design, and clear navigation tailored to their target audience of business users and developers. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for consent management, and various analytics and optimization tools. The site is hosted on robust infrastructure likely leveraging Salesforce's own cloud and Akamai CDN, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Accessibility and SEO practices are well implemented, supporting a broad user base. From a security perspective, Salesforce demonstrates a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and adherence to recognized frameworks such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2. The presence of detailed security policies, incident response contacts, and certifications underscores their commitment to enterprise-grade security. No vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected in the website content or configuration. Overall, Salesforce's website and domain exhibit high trustworthiness and professionalism. The lack of WHOIS data is due to privacy protection, which is justified for a large enterprise. The site complies with GDPR and other privacy regulations, featuring clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The risk profile is low, with recommendations focusing on maintaining current best practices and continuous monitoring.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of force.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching force.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention force.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,281,090
Employees
86
Customers
1,265,758
Third parties
15,246
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-08 · 16,887 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for force.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –conservationgrants.force.com2026-06-08
  • –nh.force.com2026-05-28
  • –utill.force.com2026-05-27
  • –mechodal5.lightning.force.com2026-05-18
  • –amazon.force.com2026-05-17

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Salesforce operates as an essential technology entity in the cloud CRM and enterprise software sector. Their business model is SaaS-based, generating revenue through subscriptions to their platform and services. The company targets medium to large enterprises and developers seeking scalable cloud solutions. Salesforce's competitive advantage lies in its integrated platform combining CRM, AI, data, and security, supported by a strong brand and extensive partner ecosystem. Growth is driven by innovation, acquisitions (MuleSoft, Tableau, Slack), and expanding cloud adoption. The company maintains a global footprint with a focus on compliance and security, reinforcing customer trust and market leadership.

Security posture

Salesforce exhibits a mature security posture with comprehensive policies, certifications, and incident response readiness. The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, with GDPR-aligned policies and consent management. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure program and security contact channels indicates proactive security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The security score is high, reflecting enterprise-grade controls appropriate for Salesforce's business scale and industry requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain regular updates and patching of all third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance transparency by publishing detailed data retention and processing policies accessible from the privacy page.
  3. Continue to monitor and audit security headers and SSL configurations to ensure compliance with evolving standards.
  4. Expand user education and awareness on privacy and security practices through website content and customer communications.
  5. Invest in continuous penetration testing and vulnerability assessments to uphold the highest security standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Salesforce, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Salesforce
Description
The Salesforce Platform unifies Data, AI, CRM, Development, and Security into a single, comprehensive platform.
Key services
CRM, Application Development, AI Integration, Data Management, Security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust, Vidyard, Boomerang, Optimizely
Frameworks
Page Builder, Salesforce Lightning Web Components
Platforms
Salesforce Platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers implemented
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security frameworks and certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Evergage, Adobe Demdex
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Evergage, Adobe Demdex
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong security posture with multiple certifications and security policies.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Clear business focus on cloud CRM and application development.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable technology stack leveraging Salesforce's proprietary platform and web components. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, consent management, and optimization, indicating a mature digital marketing and compliance strategy. Performance is optimized through CDN usage and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, supporting a wide range of devices and users. Technical risks are minimal, with no signs of outdated or vulnerable technologies. Opportunities exist to further streamline scripts and enhance accessibility features for broader compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100 +17Low19 findingsView report
  2. 65/100 −6Medium19 findingsView report
  3. 71/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with force.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review force.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.