Skip to main content

Security report for footballcampsusa.com

Football Camps USA · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Football Camps USA is an online platform that aggregates and promotes college football recruiting camps across the United States. The website is powered by Ryzer, a third-party platform specializing in sports camp management. The site targets youth and aspiring college football players, providing listings, alerts, and registration capabilities for various camps hosted by prestigious college programs. The business model focuses on connecting athletes with recruiting opportunities through an easy-to-navigate web interface. Technically, the website employs a modern but basic tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with a professional design and clear navigation. However, it lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimizations. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, although the website content itself appears professional and safe. Overall, Football Camps USA presents a functional and content-rich platform for its niche audience but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and domain registration transparency to strengthen its trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching footballcampsusa.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Football Camps USA operates as a niche educational and sports service platform, aggregating college football camps and facilitating athlete recruitment. Its partnership with Ryzer suggests a reliance on specialized third-party technology for camp management and user profiles. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive listing of camps from numerous colleges, providing a centralized resource for athletes. Revenue streams likely include referral fees or service charges associated with camp registrations. The target customers are young athletes and their families seeking college recruitment opportunities. Growth potential depends on expanding camp listings and enhancing user engagement features. The partnership ecosystem includes Ryzer and multiple college athletic programs, indicating a collaborative approach to service delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory for protecting user data in transit. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense against common web attacks like XSS and clickjacking. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies is found, indicating limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations, posing legal and reputational risks. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy implementation and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish clear contact channels for security incident reporting and vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Football Camps USA
Description
Football Camps USA works with prestigious college football programs across America. Discover the best college football camps by creating a Ryzer profile. Get recruited and earn a scholarship by turning heads at camp.
Key services
Listing of college football camps, Alerts for new camp events, Registration facilitation via Ryzer profile
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Slick Carousel 1.8.1, qTip2 3.0.3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Sarala)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about football camps
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
  5. Site uses multiple external scripts and CDNs for functionality and analytics
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
  8. Powered by Ryzer platform, indicating a third-party service for camp management
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Slick Carousel, and qTip2 libraries to deliver interactive UI components such as sliders and tooltips. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user behavior tracking. The site loads CSS and JS resources from reputable CDNs, which aids performance but requires monitoring for supply chain risks. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags for viewport and charset, but lacks advanced semantic markup and ARIA attributes for accessibility. Mobile optimization is basic, with some responsive elements but no explicit accessibility features. No CMS or backend platform is identified, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in resource loading and caching strategies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with footballcampsusa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review footballcampsusa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.