Skip to main content

Security report for font-awesome.com

Technology · Canada

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at font-awesome.com currently serves a minimal HTML page containing a redirect script, likely indicating domain parking or a redirect service rather than an active business website. The domain is registered since 2013 with a reputable registrar, suggesting legitimacy of the domain ownership. However, the lack of accessible content, metadata, or business information severely limits the ability to assess the company's current online presence or offerings. Technically, the site uses a redirect script with ad-related overlays and communicates with an external domain (router.parklogic.com), indicating monetization or domain parking activity rather than a functional business site. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of visible headers or SSL details, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site appears to be in a parked or transitional state, with significant improvements needed to restore a professional and secure online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching font-awesome.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived from the current site. The domain age and registrar data suggest a stable ownership, but no information about company operations, market positioning, or services is available. The domain is associated with the technology sector, likely related to Font Awesome iconography, but no direct business data is present. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The domain's DNS is managed by ParkLogic, a known domain parking service, which further supports the parked domain hypothesis.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to absence of visible HTTPS enforcement details, security headers, or published security policies. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which is recommended for DNS security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The presence of ad-related scripts and external XHR calls without visible privacy controls raises privacy concerns. The site is likely protected by a generic or custom WAF or anti-bot mechanism, but no major WAF provider signatures are detected. Overall, the security maturity is low and requires significant enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies accessible from the main domain.
  3. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and enforce secure headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options).
  4. Replace domain parking or redirect scripts with actual business content to improve trust and SEO.
  5. Add vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page content is a redirect script with minimal HTML and no actual site content, indicating a possible domain parking or redirect service with anti-bot or ad-block detection mechanisms. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and consists of a redirect script with no visible business content.
  2. No metadata, Open Graph, or structured data found in the HTML content.
  3. No forms, contact information, or social media links detected.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period.
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. Page appears to be a redirect or parked domain with ad-related scripts.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  9. Advertising scripts related to Google Ads are implied but no explicit tracking pixels or analytics services detected.
  10. No evidence of WAF from major providers like Cloudflare, but content is blocked/minimal indicating possible generic protection or domain parking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with embedded JavaScript redirect and ad overlay detection scripts. The domain uses ParkLogic nameservers, indicating domain parking or monetization services. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The lack of metadata, structured data, or SEO tags suggests poor technical implementation. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed due to minimal content. The technical debt is high, and modernization is needed to restore a functional and professional website presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with font-awesome.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review font-awesome.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.