Skip to main content

Security report for flukenetworks.com

Fluke Networks · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fluke Networks is a well-established provider of certification, troubleshooting, and installation tools for network cable infrastructure professionals. The company operates under the parent company Fortive Corporation and maintains a strong market position with a comprehensive product portfolio targeting network engineers, installers, and technicians. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their B2B audience. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 7 with modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as Bootstrap, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high credibility and trustworthiness despite the absence of WHOIS data, which may be due to privacy or query limitations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 14 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flukenetworks.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention flukenetworks.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,420
Employees
0
Customers
5,413
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
7%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for flukenetworks.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fluke Networks operates in the technology and telecommunications sectors, focusing on network cable testing and certification tools. Their business model is primarily B2B, serving professionals who install and maintain critical network infrastructure. The company benefits from a broad ecosystem of subsidiaries and partner companies under Fortive Corporation, enhancing its market reach and product offerings. The website supports multiple languages and regional versions, indicating a global presence. Marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Optimizely are employed to optimize user engagement and conversion. The company maintains active social media channels and provides extensive support resources, training, and events to strengthen customer relationships and brand loyalty.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent banners, and input validation in scripts. However, there is room for improvement by implementing additional security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit incident response contact information and a security.txt file suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for a corporate website of this nature.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Regularly update Drupal core and JavaScript libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact details.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Maintain transparency in data retention policies and update privacy notices accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fluke Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fluke Networks
Description
Certification, troubleshooting, and installation tools for professionals who install and maintain critical network cable infrastructure.
Key services
Cabling certification, Network troubleshooting, Installation tools, Training and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 3.1, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, FontAwesome, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Input validation in scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Drupal 7 CMS with modern JS libraries
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy
  4. Multiple language and regional site versions
  5. Clear business focus on network cabling tools
  6. No signs of phishing or malware
  7. No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  8. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube
  9. Parent company Fortive is referenced
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to query or privacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 7 CMS, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery 3.1 for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Optimizely for analytics and A/B testing, alongside OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization, especially upgrading Drupal to a supported version and optimizing JavaScript dependencies. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the presence of Cloudflare-related scripts suggests CDN usage for performance and security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence with opportunities for enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flukenetworks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flukenetworks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.