Skip to main content

Security report for flockler.com

Flockler · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flockler is a Finland-based technology company specializing in social media aggregation and user-generated content (UGC) platforms. Their SaaS offering enables marketing agencies, brands, and e-commerce businesses to embed social media feeds from multiple platforms such as Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter (X), TikTok, and YouTube. The platform supports shoppable feeds, customer reviews, and social media analytics, positioning Flockler as a trusted partner for enhancing digital engagement and social proof. The company has a solid market presence with notable clients including GoPro, Harvard University, IKEA, and Philips. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS infrastructure, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, FullStory, and Weglot for multilingual support. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Analytics and marketing tools are integrated for user behavior tracking and advertising, with GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies in place. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and maintains domain registration integrity without privacy protection, indicating transparency. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Flockler exhibits a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and a good security posture. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a dedicated security policy and incident response contacts, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and compliance further.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of flockler.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flockler.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
20
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flockler operates in the competitive social media aggregation and UGC platform market, targeting marketing agencies, brands, and e-commerce sectors. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with free trials and agency-specific plans, facilitating scalability and customer acquisition. The company leverages partnerships and showcases case studies with high-profile clients to strengthen market positioning. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscriptions, agency plans, and referral incentives. The platform's API and developer documentation indicate a focus on extensibility and custom integrations, appealing to technical users. Growth indicators include multilingual support and comprehensive resource offerings. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and trust signals, supporting sustained market relevance.

Security posture

Flockler demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, domain status protections (clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited), and use of security headers. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap in DNS security. No direct evidence of exposed credentials, malware, or phishing was found. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are missing. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential risk vectors, necessitating regular audits. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file limits transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security posture is solid but can be enhanced by formalizing security governance and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy outlining security practices and compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response contacts such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  5. Conduct regular third-party script audits to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flockler
Description
Flockler provides a platform to embed social media feeds from Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter (X), TikTok, YouTube, and more, enabling businesses and agencies to display user-generated content and social proof across websites, shops, emails, and events without technical skills.
Key services
Social media feed embedding, Shoppable UGC feeds, Customer reviews collection and display, UGC rights management, Social media analytics, API for custom integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Ads Pixel, Weglot (translation), FullStory
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
AWS (DNS via AWS Route53)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, FullStory, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Ads Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, FullStory
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Weglot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at marketing agencies and brands.
  3. Strong presence of trust signals including case studies with major brands.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers, but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and employs modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Web Fonts. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, FullStory, Facebook Ads Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is multilingual via Weglot, enhancing global reach. Performance is optimized with CDN usage and responsive design. Accessibility features such as focus outlines and font smoothing are implemented. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. The overall infrastructure is robust, scalable, and well-maintained, supporting business operations effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100 −8Medium25 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 +1Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 68/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flockler.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flockler.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.