Security report for flockler.com
Flockler · Technology · Finland
Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.
Flockler is a well-established SaaS company founded in 2010, specializing in social media aggregation and user-generated content platforms. Their service enables agencies and brands to embed social media feeds from multiple platforms with unlimited layouts and views, enhancing engagement and conversions. The company targets marketing agencies, e-commerce brands, educational institutions, and other sectors requiring social proof and customer reviews. Their market position is strong, supported by notable clients such as GoPro, Harvard University, Ikea, and Philips. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and FullStory, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is robust with HTTPS, security headers, and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms in place. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating a mature and secure digital presence.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 88/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'default' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'k1' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'selector1' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'selector2' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'mail' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'email' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'dkim' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 's1' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching flockler.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 77
- Security headers
- 60
- Email security
- 7
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 88
- Average
- 69
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
- Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts.
- Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
- Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
- Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG 2.1 AA standards.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Flockler
- Description
- Flockler provides a platform to embed social media feeds from Instagram, LinkedIn, and 13+ other platforms anywhere without technical skills. It helps agencies and brands increase engagement, conversions, and social proof through unlimited layouts and views.
- Key services
- Social media feed embedding, Shoppable UGC feeds, Customer reviews collection and display, UGC rights management, Social media analytics, API for custom integrations
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Webflow CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Weglot (translation), Helpscout, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, FullStory
- Frameworks
- Webflow
- Platforms
- Webflow hosting, AWS DNS
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 90/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security headers
- No vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Hotjar, FullStory, LinkedIn Insight Tag
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, FullStory
- Marketing tools
- Helpscout
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
- Content is comprehensive and targeted at marketing agencies and brands.
- Strong trust signals with major brand clients and case studies.
- Good use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
- Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers.
- No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
- Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
- No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms.
- No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 61/100 −10Medium25 findingsView report
- 71/100 +3Medium30 findingsView report
- 68/100Medium32 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with flockler.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flockler.com.