Skip to main content

Security report for flexera.com

Flexera · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flexera is a well-established enterprise specializing in IT management software and solutions, focusing on optimizing hybrid IT spend and risk management including ITAM, SaaS, and FinOps. With over 30 years of experience and a global team, Flexera serves more than 20,000 customers worldwide, positioning itself as a leader in technology spend optimization and IT insights. The company also operates a subsidiary, Revenera, which focuses on software monetization and analytics. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on Drupal 11, integrating advanced analytics and optimization tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer. While the site is professionally designed and mobile-optimized, SEO is limited by restrictive meta tags.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flexera.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention flexera.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
101
Employees
2
Customers
33
Third parties
66
Weak passwords
3%

Latest record dated 2025-09-12 · 7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for flexera.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –itavparsflex01.flexera.com2025-09-12
  • –itavparsflex01.flexera.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flexera operates a B2B business model targeting enterprises needing comprehensive IT spend and risk management solutions. Its market position is strong, supported by a broad portfolio of integrated solutions and a large customer base. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries like Revenera to expand its offerings. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, SaaS subscriptions, and consulting services. The presence of structured data and social media links indicates a strategic approach to digital marketing and brand consistency. However, the absence of publicly accessible WHOIS data is a notable anomaly for a company of this scale.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and VWO, indicating moderate user tracking. The missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy and cookie policies reduce overall trust. Security best practices such as CSP, HSTS, and clear data protection statements should be implemented to enhance security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Investigate and correct WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Remove or adjust 'noindex, nofollow' meta tags to improve SEO and site discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Flexera Software
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flexera
Description
Flexera helps executives succeed at what once seemed impossible: getting clarity into, and full control of, their company’s technology “black hole.” From on-premises to the cloud, Flexera helps business leaders turn IT insights into action. With a portfolio of integrated solutions that deliver unparalleled technology insights, spend optimization and agility, Flexera helps enterprises optimize their technology footprint and realize IT’s full potential to accelerate their businesses. For over 30 years, our 1,300+ team members worldwide have been passionate about helping our more than 20,000 customers fuel business success.
Key services
IT management software, Software optimization, IT cost control, SaaS management, FinOps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 11, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on main page
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a major enterprise domain
  4. Website uses modern technologies and tracking tools
  5. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. Contact information is clearly presented in structured data
  7. SEO is limited due to 'noindex, nofollow' meta tag on homepage
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 11, a modern and robust CMS platform, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern font loading techniques. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO practices and improved security headers. No hosting provider information was detected. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) extensively for organization and website metadata, improving semantic understanding by search engines.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flexera.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flexera.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.