Skip to main content

Security report for fleka.me

fleka doo · Technology · Montenegro

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fleka doo is a Montenegro-based UX/UI agency specializing in crafting digital products including websites, mobile apps, and software solutions. Established since 2008, the company positions itself as a medium-sized technology service provider with a strong portfolio including government and banking clients. Their key services encompass product discovery, UX/UI design, software development, and digital strategy consulting. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear service descriptions and client trust signals. Technically, the site is built on Angular 17, uses modern fonts and icons, and integrates analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are missing. Overall, the site is well-optimized for performance, mobile, and SEO, but lacks some compliance documentation. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, which is common for such businesses and does not raise immediate concerns. Contact information is present but email addresses are hidden behind interaction. Social media presence is active across major platforms. Recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and providing incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fleka.me

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fleka operates in the competitive UX/UI and digital product development market, targeting businesses and organizations seeking innovative and user-centric digital solutions. Their business model is service-oriented with additional proprietary products like Sken and PrestoLink, indicating diversification. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Typeform for lead capture and promotes its own products, suggesting a hybrid revenue stream. The client portfolio includes reputable banks, government entities, and international organizations, positioning Fleka as a trusted regional player. Growth indicators include a modern website, active social media, and a broad service offering. The lack of visible privacy policies may be a compliance risk in certain markets. The company appears to maintain a professional brand image with consistent messaging and strong client references.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure iframe embedding with strict referrer policies. It integrates common analytics and tracking scripts but does not expose sensitive data in the HTML. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are best practices for mature security postures. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding formal policies, security headers, and transparency about data protection and incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add visible incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy risks.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
fleka doo
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fleka doo
Description
We are a UX/UI agency in Podgorica, Montenegro. We conceptualize, design and develop digital products, websites and mobile apps.
Key services
Product discovery and conceptualization, User experience and interface design, Web and mobile software development, Digital strategy and product development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 17, Font Awesome 6, Vimeo video embedding, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure iframe embedding with referrerpolicy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Typeform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain age and registrant verification.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is present but email address is hidden behind a 'Show' button.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  7. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 17 framework with modern front-end technologies including Font Awesome 6 for icons and Google Fonts for typography. It uses Vimeo for video content embedding and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. The site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance appears fast with preloading of fonts and efficient asset management. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or SPA architecture. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, supporting a professional user experience and scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fleka.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fleka.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.