Skip to main content

Security report for flazio.org

Flazio · Technology · Italy

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flazio is a technology company providing an easy-to-use website builder platform targeting individuals and small businesses seeking to create websites without coding. The platform offers multilingual support and emphasizes fast, template-based website creation with SEO optimization features. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding, positioning Flazio as a competitive player in the online website creation market. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, multiple analytics and marketing tools, and push notification services, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust slightly but does not negate the professional appearance and functionality of the site. Overall, Flazio presents a moderate risk profile with recommendations to enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flazio.org

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention flazio.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
28
Employees
0
Customers
28
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for flazio.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flazio operates in the technology sector as a website builder service, targeting a broad audience including individuals and small businesses. Its business model is based on offering free and paid plans for website creation, leveraging SEO and marketing integrations to attract users. The company maintains active social media channels and provides customer service contact via phone. The multilingual website indicates a strategy to capture international markets. The use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising platforms suggests a focus on growth and user acquisition. However, the absence of detailed corporate information and WHOIS transparency may limit trust from enterprise clients. The platform's competitive advantage lies in ease of use and fast deployment, appealing to non-technical users.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Use of push notification opt-in via OneSignal shows attention to user consent mechanisms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicates limited transparency in incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the security posture is moderate with clear areas for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Increase transparency by updating WHOIS information or clarifying domain registration details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flazio
Description
Create your website with Flazio is easy and fast. No coding needed. Sign up for Free Today and start create your awesome website! Enjoy the creation of your website with Flazio.
Key services
Website creation, Website templates, SEO optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneSignal Push Notifications, TikTok Pixel, Outbrain, LinkedIn Insight Tag, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Push notification opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, SBB Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Outbrain
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, OneSignal
Marketing tools
OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. Contact phone number is provided in structured data but no email found.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on website building services.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. SSL is properly configured with HTTPS enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front end with integrations including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Outbrain, and OneSignal for push notifications. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts and custom font files hosted on their domain. The site employs reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation and uses cookie consent scripts. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional website builder platform with room for modernization in accessibility and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flazio.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flazio.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.