Skip to main content

Security report for fitek.com

Fitek Holding OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fitek Holding OÜ operates the FitekIN platform, a digital procure-to-pay and invoice management system designed to automate and streamline invoice workflows for businesses. The company targets organizations seeking to digitize and automate their purchase invoice processes, offering integration with ERP systems and AI-powered cost posting assignment. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and includes client testimonials and EU funding sponsorship, indicating a credible market presence primarily in Estonia and surrounding regions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. Localization is handled via i18next, supporting multiple European languages. The site is mobile-optimized and includes embedded video content and external integrations such as Calendly for demo bookings. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and spam protection on forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response information are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a technology-focused business, though the lack of WHOIS transparency and missing terms of service slightly reduce trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security disclosures and domain registration transparency would enhance credibility and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fitek.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fitek.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fitek is positioned as a niche SaaS provider specializing in procure-to-pay automation with AI enhancements. Their business model revolves around subscription-based software integrated with ERP systems, targeting medium to large enterprises seeking efficiency in invoice processing. The presence of a partner product for Benelux markets (Onea) suggests regional expansion and partnership strategy. Testimonials from financial operations leaders indicate strong client satisfaction and operational impact. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Calendly and Google Tag Manager to engage prospects and analyze user behavior. The business appears to be small-sized but focused on technology innovation and automation within the finance sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA v3 protecting user input forms. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. The missing WHOIS data is a notable concern, as domain registration transparency is a key trust factor. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a SaaS business but could be improved with enhanced headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Create and publish terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fitek Holding OÜ
Registration number
16806834
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fitek Holding OÜ
Description
FitekIN is a digital purchase invoice management system facilitating the management and workflow of e-invoices, PDFs and paper invoices.
Key services
Invoice confirmation automation, AI-based cost posting assignment, Invoice and purchase order management, ERP integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, i18next (localization), YouTube embed
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on contact form
  • Consent mechanism for cookies
  • Privacy policy linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and multilingual website with localization support.
  3. Strong focus on procure-to-pay automation and AI integration.
  4. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  8. External links include trusted domains like Google, Calendly, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  9. Mobile optimization and responsive design are implemented.
  10. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and standard technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and Google services for analytics and spam protection. Localization is well implemented with i18next supporting multiple languages. The site performance is moderate with embedded videos and external scripts but no major performance bottlenecks detected. The contact form is secured with reCAPTCHA v3 and includes validation. However, the absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or lightweight platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fitek.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fitek.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.