Skip to main content

Security report for firstis.eu

First information systems, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

First information systems, s.r.o. is a medium-sized software company specializing in the development and implementation of building software and ERP systems, primarily targeting the construction, manufacturing, logistics, and transportation sectors. Their business model focuses on delivering proprietary software solutions alongside partner products, complemented by consulting, development, integration, and implementation services. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and customer testimonials, positioning itself as a trusted regional player in its niche. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Nextend Smart Slider. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Analytics and Leady for tracking. While performance is moderate, the site is well-structured and user-friendly. However, some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks important security headers and a published privacy policy or terms of service. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no sensitive data exposure was found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business foundation but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching firstis.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a specialized niche providing ERP and building software solutions, serving primarily construction and related industries in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Their competitive advantage lies in their tailored consulting and integration services, supported by proprietary and partner software products. The presence of multiple customer testimonials and partner references indicates a stable client base and positive market reputation. The business model is service and product-based, with revenue likely generated from software licenses, consulting fees, and implementation projects. The company’s digital presence is professional but could be expanded with more comprehensive compliance documentation and security transparency to support growth and trust. Strategically, the company should consider formalizing privacy and security policies, enhancing SEO and accessibility, and possibly expanding marketing efforts to increase visibility. Partnerships and integrations with other software providers are a key part of their ecosystem, which could be leveraged further for market expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts (Google Analytics, Leady) is noted, but data retention policies and privacy compliance details are missing. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
First information systems, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
First information systems, s.r.o.
Description
Specialists in development and implementation of building software and ERP systems, offering own software and partner solutions with further development.
Key services
Consulting, Development, Integration, Implementation and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Nextend Smart Slider, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Simple Line Icons
Frameworks
Helix3 Joomla template framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
Leady tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Joomla CMS with modern frontend libraries.
  2. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided for Czech and Slovak offices.
  5. Multiple customer testimonials enhance trust.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Google Analytics and Leady tracking scripts are used.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Website is professional and business-focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS using the Helix3 template framework, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It incorporates Nextend Smart Slider for dynamic content presentation. External resources include Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and Simple Line Icons. The site loads asynchronously Google Tag Manager and Leady tracking scripts for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data (JSON-LD) found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening and improved compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firstis.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firstis.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.