FirstWave operates a cybersecurity-as-a-service platform called CyberCision™, targeting service providers and MSPs to deliver integrated email, web, and firewall security services via a cloud portal. The company positions itself as a leader in network monitoring and cybersecurity services with a global reach, leveraging partnerships with recognized technology providers such as Cisco and Microsoft. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and optimized for user experience and SEO, supporting multiple languages and integrating modern marketing and analytics tools. Technically, the site runs on WordPress hosted on AWS infrastructure with a valid SSL certificate, though it lacks modern TLS protocol support and some security headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Contact information is primarily via web forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for security enhancements.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
66
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention firstcloudsecurity.net, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for firstcloudsecurity.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
FirstWave targets telecommunications carriers, MSPs, and enterprises with a SaaS cybersecurity platform that enables scalable security service delivery. Their business model focuses on multi-tenant virtualization, billing automation, and integration of advanced security technologies. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and emphasizes cost-effective, cloud-delivered security solutions. The website content and testimonials indicate a solid market position and customer trust. Marketing efforts include multilingual support and active social media channels. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a controlled lead generation approach via forms. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on technology and telecommunications sectors.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with a valid Amazon-issued SSL certificate but does not support modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3), which is a significant security gap. No HSTS header is enabled, and OCSP stapling is absent, reducing protection against certain attacks. DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA records are not configured. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The site uses secure third-party services for analytics and live chat, with cookie consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.
Recommendations
Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols on the web server to ensure secure communications.
Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
Configure OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and security.
Add DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance domain name system security.
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Yoast SEO and Weglot for multilingual support, hosted on AWS infrastructure behind Pagely-ARES servers. It integrates Customer.io and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing automation, and uses Tawk.to for live chat support. The site is well-structured with modern fonts and responsive design. Performance metrics are not provided, but the site appears optimized for user experience. Technical debt is minimal, though security protocol support is outdated. Opportunities exist to modernize SSL/TLS configurations and enhance security headers to reduce risk exposure.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with firstcloudsecurity.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firstcloudsecurity.net.