Skip to main content

Security report for firmlinx.co.za

Firmlinx Firmlinx · Technology · South Africa

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Firmlinx is a South African ICT service provider specializing in fast and reliable IT services and consulting. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking technology solutions to improve their IT infrastructure and operations. Positioned as a small but professional entity, Firmlinx leverages WordPress with WooCommerce and the Divi theme to deliver its online presence. The website reflects a basic but functional digital maturity with moderate mobile optimization and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating awareness of basic security needs. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published privacy or cookie policies highlight areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is notably missing or inconsistent, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, Firmlinx demonstrates a moderate security posture and business credibility but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and clarifying domain registration details to build trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 15 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching firmlinx.co.za

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
98
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
58
Average
57
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention firmlinx.co.za, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
45
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
45
Weak passwords
2%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for firmlinx.co.za.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Firmlinx operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT services and consulting. Its business model revolves around providing tailored ICT solutions to clients, likely generating revenue through service contracts and consulting fees. The company maintains an active social media presence across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, supporting marketing and customer engagement efforts. The website's content and branding are moderately consistent, targeting a professional audience. The lack of detailed company history or certifications suggests a smaller scale operation with potential growth opportunities. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website's security posture is adequate but not comprehensive. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA is deployed to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration inconsistencies further detract from trustworthiness. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible GDPR or cookie consent mechanisms. These gaps expose the business to potential compliance risks and reputational damage.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to foster transparency and security readiness.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and consistent with business identity.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain a secure environment.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Firmlinx Firmlinx
Description
Fast. Reliable. ICT IT Services and IT Consulting
Key services
IT Services, IT Consulting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Divi Theme, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears available which is inconsistent
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. Contact information limited to phone and social media links
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Divi theme and WooCommerce
  6. Security practices include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lack security headers
  7. Moderate use of tracking and marketing scripts
  8. Content quality is basic with some branding consistency
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good user experience and SEO fundamentals. However, the lack of advanced SEO and accessibility features indicates room for technical enhancement. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, and no CDN or advanced caching mechanisms were detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firmlinx.co.za. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firmlinx.co.za.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.