Skip to main content

Security report for fireeye.com

Trellix · Technology · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

67/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trellix is a leading cybersecurity company providing an AI-powered security platform designed to empower security operations teams worldwide. The company offers a broad range of integrated security products and services, including threat detection and response, managed detection and response, professional services, and education. Trellix is recognized by industry analysts and has received multiple awards, positioning it as a trusted leader in the cybersecurity market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and comprehensive content aimed at enterprise security professionals. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks, animation libraries, and advanced analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Adobe DTM. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Hosting appears to leverage Akamai CDN services, enhancing global delivery and security. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses several security best practices, though explicit security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms like cookie consent banners and privacy policies are not clearly detected in the provided content. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration transparency, but the professional branding and industry recognition mitigate concerns. Overall, Trellix presents a strong cybersecurity business with a robust online presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing visible privacy and cookie compliance, publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts, and improving WHOIS transparency to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fireeye.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
67

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trellix operates as an essential entity in the cybersecurity technology sector, targeting enterprise security operations teams and CISOs. Its business model revolves around delivering an integrated AI-driven security platform combined with managed services and professional training. The company leverages a strong partner ecosystem and maintains multiple portals for partners, developers, and customers. Market positioning is reinforced by industry awards and analyst recognitions, indicating competitive advantages in detection efficacy and platform breadth. Revenue streams likely include product sales, managed services, and training. Growth indicators include active content updates, webinars, and customer testimonials. The partnership ecosystem includes AWS, Google Cloud, and Telefónica Tech, highlighting strategic alliances.

Security posture

Trellix demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and use of reputable analytics and tag management services. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not confirmed in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response information and vulnerability disclosure policies are not evident, which could impact readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced policy visibility and compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and prominently link a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details on the website to enhance trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trellix
Description
Trellix empowers SecOps worldwide with the industry’s broadest and responsibly architected, GenAI-powered security platform.
Key services
Threat detection and response platform, Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Professional services including Trellix Thrive, Education and training services, Threat intelligence research
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, GSAP, Lottie animations, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Adobe DTM (Dynamic Tag Management), Marketo Munchkin, Chart.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by bootstrap-icons font), Adobe Experience Platform Launch
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile optimized)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused scripts and analytics
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Adobe Analytics (via DTM), Marketo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Adobe DTM, Marketo Munchkin, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Platform Launch, Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered cybersecurity platform and services.
  3. Multiple internal navigation menus and extensive resource links.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in provided content.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  6. Social media links to Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube present in JSON-LD.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy or unregistered domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including JavaScript libraries (jQuery, GSAP), animation frameworks (Lottie), analytics tools (Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Adobe DTM), and marketing automation (Marketo). The site is hosted likely on Akamai CDN, ensuring fast global delivery and resilience. Performance is optimized with preloading fonts and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy compliance features to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fireeye.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fireeye.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.