Skip to main content

Security report for finvalda.lt

Finvalda · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finvalda is a Lithuanian company specializing in financial management software solutions for businesses of various sizes, offering modular products, integrations, and data protection features. Established in 2004, it holds a stable market position with a focus on serving small to large enterprises. The website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. Overall, the site reflects a professional and trustworthy business presence with good technical and privacy compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finvalda.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Finvalda operates in the technology and finance sectors, providing financial management systems and payroll solutions. Its business model revolves around software licensing and SaaS offerings, targeting Lithuanian businesses. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Google and Meta for analytics and marketing. The website content and structured data indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear service portfolio. The absence of terms of service and explicit security policies suggests areas for maturity improvement. The company maintains a Facebook presence, enhancing customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot activity. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing potential improvement areas. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could enhance transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finvalda
Description
FINVALDA finansų valdymo sistemos verslui: specializuoti moduliai, integracijos, duomenų apsauga. Profesionalios finansų valdymo programos mažoms, vidutinėms ir didelėms įmonėms.
Key services
Financial management software modules, Integrations, Data protection, Payroll and personnel management solutions, Server services, Training and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.7, PHP, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent bots
  • Cookie consent with opt-in and opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent fully implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No visible security.txt or explicit security policies
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Contact information primarily via contact page and Facebook link
  6. Website built on WordPress with common plugins
  7. No signs of phishing or malware
  8. Good SEO and structured data implementation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.4.7 with standard plugins for analytics and cookie consent. It uses Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for tracking and security. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Hosting appears stable with a long-registered domain. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business scale.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finvalda.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finvalda.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.