Skip to main content

Security report for fintelligence.ai

Fintelligence · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fintelligence is a small technology company offering a reputation check solution leveraging publicly available information to help reduce risks and protect reputation. The website is built on the Wix platform and presents basic but professional content focused on their core service. The technical infrastructure is standard for Wix-hosted sites, with modern polyfills and error monitoring via Sentry. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no contact information is provided, which impacts trust and credibility. Overall, the site is accessible and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fintelligence.ai

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and professionals interested in reputation management and risk reduction. The business model appears to be service-based, focusing on reputation checks using public data. Market positioning is not explicitly stated, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The website content is minimal, indicating a small-scale operation. There is no evidence of extensive marketing or analytics tools, suggesting a lean digital presence. The lack of contact and policy information limits business credibility and customer trust.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface. The site uses Sentry for error monitoring, indicating some level of operational security awareness. Absence of incident response contacts or security policies is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, security posture is moderate but could be improved with better headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including company email and phone number to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  4. Provide incident response and security contact information to demonstrate readiness and transparency.
  5. Enhance website content with more detailed business information and trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fintelligence
Description
Discover the Power of publicly available information - Fintelligence reputation check solution. Reduce risks and save reputation!
Key services
reputation check solution
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Sentry (error monitoring), core-js polyfills, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Content Security Policy not detected
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query failure or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  5. No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
  6. Site uses HTTPS with no visible security headers in HTML source.
  7. Content is minimal and focused on reputation check service.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected except Sentry error monitoring.
  9. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using standard Wix scripts and polyfills for browser compatibility. It uses Sentry for error monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. SEO metadata is present but basic. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies are detected. Hosting is managed by Wix, a reputable provider. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small Wix site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fintelligence.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fintelligence.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.