Skip to main content

Security report for fingolex.com

fingolex · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

fingolex is a boutique law firm specializing in IT law, with a focus on cloud computing, artificial intelligence, digitalization, and data protection. The company targets technology sector clients seeking customized legal solutions optimized for their success. Founded in 2019, fingolex positions itself as a pragmatic and entrepreneurial legal partner offering modular and product-focused legal advice. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed team profiles and insightful articles, supporting its market niche. Technically, the website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, and employs Matomo analytics with cookies disabled to respect user privacy. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and SEO-friendly, though it lacks explicit CMS identification and some advanced security headers. Hosting details are limited but the domain registrar is reputable. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. There is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, which could be improved for GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, fingolex presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and published policies would enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fingolex.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fingolex.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fingolex.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

fingolex operates in a specialized niche providing legal consulting services tailored to the technology sector, particularly IT law, cloud, and AI. Its business model emphasizes product-focused legal advice that is modular and scalable, allowing efficient handling of standard legal issues while dedicating resources to complex cases. The firm leverages its interdisciplinary expertise in law and IT to differentiate itself from traditional law firms. The target customers are tech companies and businesses undergoing digital transformation. The firm maintains a professional online presence with published insights and a LinkedIn profile, indicating active engagement with its market. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent boutique operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents areas for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may limit transparency and preparedness perception. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism could pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small boutique firm but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fingolex
Description
Your boutique law firm for IT law, in particular cloud c; AI. IT law. Digitalisation. Data. Optimised for your success >
Key services
Cloud legal advice, Artificial Intelligence legal expertise, Contracts and contract negotiations, Data protection and IP consulting, Legal trainings
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Matomo Analytics
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is focused on IT law and technology sector legal consulting
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact is via form
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Use of Matomo analytics with cookies disabled
  7. No visible security headers in HTML content
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found
  9. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, and uses Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies, reflecting privacy-conscious design. The site is mobile-optimized and fast-loading with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or framework is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is INWX GmbH, a reputable provider. The site lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant web presence suitable for the firm's business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fingolex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fingolex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.