Skip to main content

Security report for findresultsquick.com

findresultsquick.com · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

findresultsquick.com is a newly registered website (2025) operating as a web search portal offering search and autocomplete functionalities. The site targets general web users seeking search services and appears to monetize via advertising and tracking. The technical infrastructure relies on older jQuery and third-party consent management scripts, with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, but no terms of service or explicit security policies are present. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the site is functional but exhibits limited business credibility and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching findresultsquick.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be a search engine or aggregator with monetization through ads and tracking. The partnership with skenzo.com for privacy policy hosting suggests some external collaboration. The market position is unclear but likely small or niche given the minimal branding and content. The site lacks detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals, which may impact user confidence. Growth potential depends on improving transparency, security, and user engagement.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic with HTTPS enabled and clientTransferProhibited domain status. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and detailed security policies indicates gaps. The site uses consent management for GDPR compliance but lacks incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities were detected, but improvements are needed to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels.
  4. Add clear business contact information including verified emails and phone numbers.
  5. Upgrade technical stack to modern libraries and improve mobile and accessibility features.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
findresultsquick.com
Description
A web search portal providing a search interface with autocomplete suggestions and a search results page. The site appears to be a search engine or search aggregator.
Key services
Web search, Autocomplete suggestions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, ConsentManager.net CMP, Custom JavaScript for autocomplete and tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ConsentManager.net
Tracking pixels
KafkaLogPixelLib, endUserBehaviourPixel
Marketing tools
ConsentManager CMP, Custom tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic search portal with minimal branding and content.
  2. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  3. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; only a contact form link.
  5. Uses older jQuery version (1.11.3) and third-party consent management scripts.
  6. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC implemented.
  7. Domain WHOIS data is minimal and generic, reducing trust.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses jQuery 1.11.3, which is outdated and may have security vulnerabilities. ConsentManager.net CMP scripts are used for cookie consent and GDPR compliance. Hosting details are unclear but DNS is managed via ztomy.com. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No CMS detected. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Technical debt is evident in legacy scripts and minimal security configurations, posing risks to business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with findresultsquick.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review findresultsquick.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.