Skip to main content

Security report for finconsgroup.com

Fincons Group AG · Technology · Switzerland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fincons Group AG is a well-established IT business consulting and system integration company with over 40 years of experience. The company operates internationally with offices across Europe and the US, serving industries such as media, financial services, energy, transportation, manufacturing, public administration, and international institutions. Their business model focuses on providing consulting, system integration, proprietary solutions, and smart-shore services, supported by a strong partnership ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting enterprise clients and organizations seeking digital transformation solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Slick Carousel, with integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility enhancements could be made. The CMS used is Kali, a custom solution, indicating a tailored digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, showing transparent and consistent registration information, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy or incident response contact, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finconsgroup.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fincons Group holds a strong market position as an international IT consulting and system integration firm with a diversified portfolio across multiple industries. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience, multi-country presence, and comprehensive service offerings including proprietary solutions and smart-shore models. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting contracts, system integration projects, and ongoing partnerships. The target customer segments are large enterprises and public institutions requiring digital transformation and technology integration. Growth indicators include active case studies, spotlight projects, and participation in industry events. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with multiple subsidiaries and international offices enhancing market reach and service delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities were identified in the visible content or scripts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Data protection practices appear adequate, but formal documentation or DPO contact details are not found. Overall, the security culture is positive but could benefit from formalizing policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fincons Group AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fincons Group AG
Description
For over 40 years, Fincons has been providing cutting-edge services, solutions, and technologies on international markets to support digital transformation.
Key services
Consulting, System Integration, Proprietary Solutions, Smart-Shore, Partnerships, Competence Centers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 5.3.3, Font Awesome 6.5.1, Slick Carousel 1.9.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), CookieLaw.org Consent Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieLaw.org Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  2. Strong presence in multiple European countries and the US with physical addresses.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS named Kali and leverages modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap 5.3.3, jQuery 3.7.1, and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed and script management. The technical infrastructure supports a professional digital presence but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finconsgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finconsgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.