Skip to main content

Security report for fima.lt

UAB „Fima“ · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB „Fima“ is a leading smart infrastructure solutions company operating in the Baltic Sea region for over 32 years. The company specializes in delivering complex engineering projects across sectors such as energy, transport, telecommunications, and government infrastructure. Their services range from consulting and system design to implementation and maintenance, supported by subsidiaries in Latvia and Poland. The website reflects a mature business with a broad project portfolio and multiple office locations, targeting both public and private sector clients in the Baltic region. Technically, the website employs a traditional tech stack including jQuery, Google Maps API, and various analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. While the site is accessible and well-structured, some technologies like jQuery are outdated, and security headers are not evident, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. The site is served over HTTPS, and privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant. Security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the content, but the absence of visible security headers and incident response information suggests potential gaps. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the business information and certifications presented support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency. Strategic recommendations include updating third-party libraries, implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures, and providing clear incident response contacts to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fima.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fima holds a strong market position as a specialized infrastructure engineering firm with a diversified portfolio across multiple sectors including energy, transport, and government. Their business model focuses on end-to-end project delivery, from concept to maintenance, supported by international subsidiaries enhancing regional reach. The company leverages certifications such as ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 to demonstrate quality and security commitment. Their target customers are primarily public institutions and large enterprises in the Baltic region. The website content and project listings indicate a mature operation with extensive experience and a broad service offering, positioning Fima as a key player in smart infrastructure modernization in their markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and absence of security headers like Content Security Policy and HSTS are notable weaknesses. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The presence of multiple tracking scripts requires careful privacy management. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security best practices and transparency are recommended to enhance resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update jQuery and other third-party libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and response.
  4. Review and optimize tracking and analytics scripts to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB „Fima“
VAT number
LT212896917
Registration number
121289694
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB „Fima“
Description
Pirmaujanti išmanios infrastruktūros sprendimų kompanija Baltijos jūros šalių regione, dalyvaujanti viešosios ir privačios infrastruktūros modernizavimo projektuose, siūlanti informacinių ryšių ir technologijų, saugos, automatikos, pastatų infrastruktūros, transporto ir energetikos sprendimus.
Key services
Elektroninės apsaugos sprendimai, Informacinių ir ryšių technologijų sprendimai, Duomenų centrų infrastruktūra, Elektros energetikos sprendimai, Intelektualios transporto sistemos, Geležinkelių sprendimai, Valdymo ir atvaizdavimo sprendimai, Automatikos ir monitoringo sprendimai, Specializuoti sprendimai
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.5.2, SWFObject, Google Maps API v3, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (ga.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain, indicating possible registration or query issues
  3. Company presents itself as a leading infrastructure solutions provider in Baltic region
  4. Multiple office locations in Lithuania, Latvia, and Poland with detailed contact info
  5. Use of multiple tracking and analytics scripts including Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google
  6. Cookie consent banner present with link to detailed cookie policy PDF
  7. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant
  8. No explicit terms of service or incident response contact found
  9. Website uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks
  10. No visible security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy jQuery 1.5.2 library alongside SWFObject and Google Maps API v3, indicating a somewhat dated technology stack. It integrates multiple asynchronous analytics and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag managed via Google Tag Manager. The site structure is well-organized with dynamic content loading via AJAX for submenus and project listings. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fima.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fima.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.