Skip to main content

Security report for filibaba.com

Filibaba AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Filibaba AB is a small technology company based in Sweden specializing in developing plant-based cooking and eco-friendly lifestyle applications. Their website highlights three main apps: Plantry, Handla, and Veggie Meals, targeting consumers interested in sustainable and healthy cooking habits. The company positions itself in a niche market focused on green and plant-based cooking solutions, leveraging a professional and consistent brand image. Technically, the website uses modern HTML5 and CSS with responsive design elements and appropriate SEO meta tags, though no advanced frameworks or CMS are detected. The site performs moderately well with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; while no critical vulnerabilities or exposed data are evident, the site lacks security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed from the HTML alone. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. Business credibility is supported by clear company identification, contact email, and LinkedIn presence, but lacks detailed legal or certification disclosures. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filibaba.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Filibaba operates in the technology sector focusing on green and plant-based cooking apps, serving environmentally conscious consumers. Their business model revolves around app development and promotion of sustainable cooking habits. The company leverages partnerships with related app domains (Plantry and Handla) to expand its ecosystem. Market positioning is niche but well-defined, with a focus on health and environmental benefits. Revenue streams likely include app sales or subscriptions, though not explicitly stated. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, indicating stable operations and growth potential. Strategic partnerships and clear branding support market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. No forms or user input fields are present on the main page, reducing attack surface. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. HTTPS enforcement is not verifiable from the HTML content alone but is recommended. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site shows no critical vulnerabilities but would benefit from enhanced security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and published security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide to ensure secure communications.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Filibaba AB
Description
Our team creates outstanding apps that turns plant-based cooking into a habit that simplifies everyday life. For your health and the planet.
Key services
Plantry app - planet friendly meal planning, Handla app - family shared eco-friendly grocery shopping list, Veggie Meals - green cooking app platform for top chefs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Responsive images with srcset, Meta tags for SEO and social media
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected on main page
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website focuses on plant-based cooking apps with a green/environmental theme
  2. No forms or data collection on main page
  3. No cookie consent or tracking detected
  4. Contact via email and LinkedIn only
  5. No visible security policies or incident response info
  6. No terms of service found
  7. Good branding consistency and professional design
  8. No advanced analytics or advertising detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean, modern HTML5 and CSS, utilizing responsive images and meta tags for SEO and social media integration. No JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a lightweight and straightforward technical implementation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility. The absence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the HTML content. Opportunities exist to modernize with security headers, enhanced accessibility, and performance optimizations to reduce technical risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filibaba.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filibaba.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.