Skip to main content

Security report for figpii.com

FigPii · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FigPii is a technology company providing an all-in-one conversion rate optimization platform that integrates A/B testing, heatmaps, session recordings, and polls & surveys. The platform targets e-commerce brands, CRO agencies, and SaaS companies seeking to improve user experience and increase revenue. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, calls to action, and multimedia demonstrations, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site employs modern analytics and tracking technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, hosted likely on AWS with Cloudflare services. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though privacy compliance could be improved by adding cookie consent mechanisms and clearer contact information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, FigPii presents as a credible SaaS provider with room for improvement in privacy and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching figpii.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FigPii positions itself as an affordable and lightweight alternative in the competitive CRO market, integrating multiple tools into a single platform. Its business model is SaaS-based with free trials and demos to attract users. The company emphasizes ease of use, budget-friendliness, and robust customer support. The target market includes e-commerce, SaaS, and CRO agencies, indicating a focus on digital businesses seeking optimization solutions. The website highlights over 3700 brands using the platform and claims 99.99% uptime, signaling operational reliability. Partnerships with calendly.com and trello.com for demos and roadmaps enhance user engagement. However, the lack of visible company registration and contact details may hinder trust for some prospects.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of reputable third-party analytics and tracking services is evident, with scripts loaded asynchronously to minimize performance impact. However, the absence of a cookie consent banner and explicit privacy controls may present compliance risks under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program reduces the ability for external security researchers to report issues. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance privacy compliance and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a clear Terms of Service page outlining user rights and obligations.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security transparency.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration details to enhance legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FigPii
Description
FigPii is an all-in-one conversion optimization platform offering A/B testing, heatmaps, session recordings, and polls & surveys to improve website user experience and increase conversions.
Key services
A/B Testing, Heatmaps, Session Recordings, Polls & Surveys
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Swiper.js, FontAwesome, Calendly, Changelogfy, Zaraz (Cloudflare) tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of third-party tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, FigPii internal analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, FigPii Tracking Pixel
Marketing tools
Calendly, Changelogfy
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers a comprehensive CRO platform with multiple integrated tools.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear calls to action and demo options.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  4. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status.
  6. Use of modern tracking and analytics technologies.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Swiper.js for carousels, FontAwesome for icons, and Calendly for scheduling demos. Hosting appears to leverage AWS S3 for assets and Cloudflare for performance and security. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloads key media assets for performance. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses multiple asynchronous scripts for tracking and analytics, balancing functionality and performance. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities to enhance accessibility and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with figpii.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review figpii.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.