Skip to main content

Security report for figmentcapital.io

Figment Investment Management LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Figment Capital is a specialized investment fund focused on early-stage blockchain infrastructure projects within the Web3 ecosystem. Founded in 2021 and based in New York, it leverages a strong partnership with Figment Inc., a reputable staking infrastructure provider, to provide both capital and technical support to its portfolio companies. The firm positions itself as a trusted partner for Web3 developers and entrepreneurs, emphasizing infrastructure solutions that enable next-generation blockchain applications. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, offering a professional and mobile-optimized user experience with moderate performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though privacy compliance could be improved with explicit cookie consent and a more comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the site reflects a credible and professional business with room for enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching figmentcapital.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Figment Capital operates in the technology sector as an early-stage venture capital fund specializing in blockchain infrastructure. Its competitive advantage lies in its close ties to Figment Inc., providing unique technical insights and credibility. The business model focuses on high-conviction investments and active engagement with founders. The target market includes blockchain startups and Web3 developers seeking infrastructure funding and support. The firm maintains a lean team and small company size, with a clear digital presence through social media and an investor portal. Growth indicators include recent fund launches and strategic partnerships. The website content and structure support a professional image, though additional transparency in compliance and security policies could strengthen trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled, ensuring secure communications. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits the site's security maturity. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed GDPR-related disclosures. The security culture appears cautious but could benefit from more explicit communication of security practices and incident handling procedures. Overall, the security posture is good but not comprehensive.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Develop and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Publish an incident response plan or contact channel for security incidents to enhance transparency.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Figment Investment Management LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Figment Investment Management LLC
Description
Figment Capital is a Web3 infrastructure investment fund launched in 2021, investing in early-stage blockchain infrastructure projects. It works closely with founders to scale projects from idea to adoption, leveraging its connection with Figment Inc., a reputable staking infrastructure provider. The firm focuses on backing infrastructure solutions that empower next-generation Web3 applications.
Key services
Investment in blockchain infrastructure projects, Strategic guidance and technical support to portfolio companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Squarespace platform
Platforms
Squarespace hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Squarespace with good branding consistency.
  2. Content focuses on Web3 infrastructure investment with clear business positioning.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners visible, which may affect compliance.
  4. Contact information is limited to email and address; no phone number provided.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  6. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn supports business credibility.
  7. Investor portal link indicates active business operations.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Squarespace defaults.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, utilizing modern HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript technologies. It employs a responsive design optimized for mobile devices and moderate performance. The hosting is managed by Squarespace, which provides SSL/TLS certificates and HSTS headers, contributing to a secure environment. The site uses minimal third-party scripts, reducing potential attack surface and improving load times. SEO optimization is basic but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, with opportunities to improve privacy compliance and accessibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with figmentcapital.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review figmentcapital.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.