Skip to main content

Security report for fight.me

Nekki · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fight.me is an online competitive fight club management game developed by Nekki, a reputable game developer with a large global player base. The website presents a professional and modern interface targeting gamers interested in strategy and digital collectibles. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, Google reCAPTCHA, and multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and anti-bot measures, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms of use present, but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR explicit statements. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in the gaming market but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fight.me

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector focusing on online gaming with digital collectibles, targeting competitive gamers. The business model revolves around game engagement and possibly in-game purchases or tournaments. The domain is newly registered in 2023, consistent with the launch of the game. The company leverages social media platforms and community channels like Discord and Telegram to engage users. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for gaming companies to protect registrant privacy. No direct contact information is provided, which is common for gaming platforms relying on community support channels.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect against automated abuse. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could improve defense against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Tracking and marketing scripts are present, which may raise privacy concerns if not properly disclosed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better header policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for security issues.
  5. Improve privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nekki
Description
Fight Me is a competitive fight club management game where you collect fighters, train and upgrade them to win tournaments and climb the ranks. Fight Me is developed by Nekki — the game developer with over 1 billion players worldwide!
Key services
competitive fight club management game, digital collectibles, online tournaments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by bundle naming), Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Helpshift Chat, Telegram Web App
Frameworks
React (implied)
Platforms
Browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
advertblock
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Mail.ru tracking
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Helpshift Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a gaming platform for a competitive fight club game with digital collectibles.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the landing page.
  3. Privacy and terms pages are present but privacy policy is basic and lacks explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and marketing scripts including Facebook Pixel and Yandex Metrika.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Domain uses privacy protection service for WHOIS.
  9. Website content is professional and targeted at gamers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack likely based on React, with asynchronous loading of scripts for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses multiple third-party services including Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, and Helpshift chat for user engagement and tracking. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or SPA architecture. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but domain registrar is GoDaddy. The site lacks some accessibility features and advanced SEO optimizations but includes proper meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fight.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fight.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.