Skip to main content

Security report for figge-schuster.de

FIGGE+SCHUSTER AG · Technology · Germany

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FIGGE+SCHUSTER AG is a Munich-based internet agency specializing in high-quality websites and online presences for medium-sized companies, with over 20 years of experience. Their core competencies include website relaunches, Weblication CMS development, SEO, Google Ads, film and video production, and corporate design. The company targets clients primarily in the German-speaking region, focusing on complex industries such as healthcare, real estate, and technology. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on the Weblication CMS platform, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and integrates etracker analytics. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. WHOIS data is consistent with the business profile, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching figge-schuster.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention figge-schuster.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for figge-schuster.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as an experienced internet agency with a focus on medium-sized enterprises. Their business model revolves around providing comprehensive digital marketing and web development services, including CMS-based website relaunches and online marketing campaigns. They maintain a Google Partner status, indicating certified expertise in Google Ads. The agency showcases a broad portfolio of projects across various sectors, including healthcare, real estate, and food & beverage. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and analytics providers like etracker. Growth indicators include a diverse client base and a history of 20 years in the market. The company emphasizes technical excellence and aesthetic quality, which supports their competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR. The contact form includes anti-spam measures. However, there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of third-party analytics (etracker) is privacy-conscious with cookie blocking options. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from additional security headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain and document data retention policies and privacy compliance measures to strengthen GDPR adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FIGGE+SCHUSTER AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FIGGE+SCHUSTER AG
Description
Experten im Online-Marketing mit Kernkompetenzen in Unternehmensauftritten, Website-Relaunch, Microsites, Landingpages, Film & Video, SEO und Google Ads. 20 Jahre Erfahrung.
Key services
Website Relaunch, Weblication CMS Development, SEO, Google Ads, Film & Video, Corporate Design, Online Marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Weblication CMS, JavaScript, jQuery, etracker analytics
Frameworks
Weblication CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Contact form with anti-spam hidden field

Analytics and tracking

Services
etracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
etracker
Marketing tools
Google Ads, etracker
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Uses Weblication CMS, a professional German CMS.
  3. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  5. Contact form includes anti-spam hidden field.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Vimeo, YouTube.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with domain usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Weblication CMS, a professional German content management system, and uses JavaScript and jQuery for frontend interactions. Analytics are handled via etracker, with cookie consent implemented to comply with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with some optimization potential. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information and security headers, which could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with figge-schuster.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review figge-schuster.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.