Skip to main content

Security report for fiare.com

Fiare · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fiare is a Finnish technology company specializing in digital marketplace platforms, vehicle trade solutions, and media tools such as CMS and layout automation. Established in 2001, it serves businesses seeking to create successful online marketplaces and integrated order processing systems. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a focus on automotive, aviation, and real estate sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. The site employs Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management and integrates Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior insights. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security headers are not evident in the HTML. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. The domain is long-established and registered with a reputable registrar, enhancing trust. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and targets B2B clients in technology and digital marketplace sectors.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fiare.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fiare.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fiare operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital marketplaces and media solutions. Its business model is B2B, providing software platforms and services to industries like automotive and real estate. The company leverages partnerships, such as with fiaremediatools.com, to extend its media tool offerings. The website content and structured data indicate a consistent brand and clear market positioning. The lack of visible direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on qualified leads via forms or direct outreach. The integration of marketing and tracking tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. The company appears to be small-sized but established, with a clear niche and growth potential in digital transformation services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The presence of multiple third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Pipedrive LeadBooster) introduces potential attack surface and privacy concerns if not properly managed. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly visible, which is a gap for transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage or footer.
  4. Add visible and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers for trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fiare
Description
Create successful online markeplaces, vehicle trade solutions, and media solutions like CMS, layout automation and integrated order processing with Fiare
Key services
Marketplace platform development, Vehicle trade solutions, Media tools including CMS and layout automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Ultimate VC Addons, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Pipedrive LeadBooster
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security cookies (e.g., atlassian.xsrf.token)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Pipedrive LeadBooster, lfeeder
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO tools
  2. Cookie consent managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage or main HTML content
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts present
  6. Good use of structured data for SEO and business information
  7. No security headers explicitly found in HTML but HTTPS enforced
  8. Domain is long-established and registered with reputable registrar
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, and Ultimate VC Addons. It uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses multiple external domains for tracking and marketing, which should be monitored for privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fiare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fiare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.