Skip to main content

Security report for fg.cz

FG Forrest, a.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FG Forrest, a.s. is a well-established Czech internet agency specializing in creating extensive transactional websites, e-shops, and intranets since 1996. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for online business, serving a broad range of clients including large enterprises. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content showcasing their services and client successes. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and a proprietary CMS platform (Edee.one), ensuring a robust infrastructure. Security-wise, FG Forrest demonstrates strong commitment through ISO 27001 certification and cookie consent mechanisms, although some security headers are not visibly implemented. Overall, the website is secure, compliant with GDPR, and professionally managed, though the absence of WHOIS data slightly impacts domain transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers and improving incident response visibility to further strengthen trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fg.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fg.cz

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
95
Email security
98
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FG Forrest operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, focusing on custom web and e-shop development for B2B and B2C clients. Their market position is strong, supported by over 27 years of experience, multiple industry awards, and a portfolio of high-profile clients such as ČEZ and Kooperativa. The company leverages proprietary technology (Edee.one CMS) and maintains partnerships with other agencies, enhancing their service offerings. Their business model centers on delivering tailored digital solutions with a focus on long-term client success. Growth indicators include continuous client testimonials and active content updates. The company maintains a consistent brand image and demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness.

Security posture

FG Forrest exhibits a mature security posture highlighted by ISO 27001 certification, indicating a formalized information security management system. The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response contact information is not prominently displayed, which could be enhanced to improve readiness. Overall, the security practices are solid but could benefit from additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  2. Publish clear incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies with user-friendly consent management.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to foster responsible security reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FG Forrest, a.s.
VAT number
CZ25290568
Registration number
25290568
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FG Forrest, a.s.
Description
Internetová agentura s tradicí od roku 1996. Tvoříme zejména rozsáhlé transakční weby, e-shopy a intranety. Jsme váš partner pro online.
Key services
Custom B2C and B2B e-shops, Corporate websites, Intranets
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Maps API, Plausible Analytics, Typekit Fonts, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Custom CMS (Edee.one), JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • ISO 27001 certification indicating strong information security management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on B2B e-commerce and web development services.
  3. Multiple awards and certifications enhance credibility.
  4. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  7. Active social media presence and client testimonials.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including custom CMS (Edee.one), JavaScript frameworks, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and Plausible Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading for images and asynchronous script loading. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses Google Maps API for location services. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, supporting a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fg.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fg.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.