Skip to main content

Security report for fevogm.com

Fevo Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FEVO Enterprise operates as an online group ticket sales platform designed to facilitate organizations in managing group clients and increasing revenue opportunities. The platform targets organizations that require efficient group ticket sales and marketing tools. The website content and metadata indicate a professional and focused business model with a niche market position in ticket sales technology. The parent company appears to be Fevo Inc., as indicated by privacy and terms of service links. Technically, the website employs a modern React-based stack with integrations for multiple payment gateways including Braintree, Shift4, and Zip.co, alongside analytics and consent management tools. Accessibility is addressed through EqualWeb, and security is enhanced with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and consent frameworks. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.gofevo.com raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and external references suggest a legitimate business presence. Security posture is strong but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy standards, but lacks direct contact information and cookie consent visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fevogm.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FEVO Enterprise is positioned as a specialized technology provider in the event ticketing sector, focusing on group sales and marketing management. The business model leverages SaaS platform capabilities with integrated payment processing and identity verification partnerships, including Allianz Assistance, ID.me, and Zip.co. The company targets medium-sized organizations requiring scalable ticket sales solutions. The presence of multiple payment partners and analytics tools indicates a mature digital ecosystem. The lack of direct contact information on the site may limit customer engagement, but the linkage to the parent domain fevo.com suggests a broader corporate structure. The company demonstrates consistent branding and a clear value proposition, with growth potential in the event management technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate bot activity, and integration of multiple secure payment gateways with public API keys. Consent management is handled via Didomi, supporting GDPR compliance. Accessibility features are implemented through EqualWeb, enhancing inclusivity. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are present, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced security header implementation and clearer security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add explicit incident response and security policy pages to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to ensure visible and compliant user consent management.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security and support emails to improve trust and communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and payment integrations to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fevo Inc.
Description
FEVO Enterprise is an online group ticket sales platform that serves as a valuable marketing and management tool for your group clients, while helping your organization better identify those members within the group to increase revenue opportunities.
Key services
Group ticket sales, Marketing tools for groups, Management tools for organizations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Fonts, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Braintree, Shift4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Heap Analytics, Facebook SDK, reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Apple Pay SDK, Zip.co payment, LaunchDarkly, Didomi Consent Management, EqualWeb Accessibility
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Use of multiple payment gateways with public keys
  • Consent management via Didomi
  • Accessibility compliance via EqualWeb

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Heap Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Heap Analytics, Google Analytics 4
Marketing tools
LaunchDarkly, Heap Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the domain, indicating possible unregistered or privacy-protected status.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and multiple payment integrations.
  4. Privacy and terms of service are linked to fevo.com domain, indicating relationship or parent company.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite cookie policy absence.
  7. Good accessibility features implemented via EqualWeb.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No incident response or security policy pages found.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with extensive use of third-party libraries and APIs for fonts, icons, carousels, and payment processing. It integrates multiple payment gateways (Braintree, Shift4, Zip.co, Apple Pay) and identity verification services (ID.me). Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics 4, Heap Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LaunchDarkly feature flags. Accessibility is addressed via EqualWeb. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile optimized and accessible. However, no CMS is detected, and hosting provider details are not evident. The technical stack is modern and robust but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fevogm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fevogm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.