Skip to main content

Security report for feratel.fr

Feratel · Technology · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feratel is a medium-sized technology company specializing in providing comprehensive, customized tourism marketing and data management solutions. The company has a strong market presence in France and other European countries, supported by multiple regional domains and multilingual content. Their business model focuses on B2B services targeting tourism industry professionals and destination managers. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and optimized for mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern cookie consent management via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. The use of HTTPS and inclusion of detailed cookie categories demonstrate a commitment to privacy and security. However, some security headers are not explicitly detected, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are found, indicating room for improvement in security posture. The security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but the absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust assessment. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and granular user consent options. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and professional, with a good balance of content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and providing clear contact information for incident response to further strengthen trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feratel.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Feratel operates in the tourism technology sector, offering a suite of solutions including marketing, upselling, service, data strategy, communication, and interface management. The company leverages a multilingual and multi-regional web presence to serve diverse European markets. Their competitive advantage lies in providing tailored, comprehensive tourism solutions that add value to destination management. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, consulting, and service subscriptions. The target customers are tourism boards, destination marketers, and related organizations. Growth indicators include active cookie consent management and integration of modern analytics tools. The partnership ecosystem includes regional domains and third-party services like Cookiebot and Google Analytics. The company maintains a professional online presence but could improve transparency around security and contact details.

Security posture

Feratel demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. The website enforces HTTPS and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No critical security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting potential gaps in HTTP security configurations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts indicates limited readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized security documentation and enhanced HTTP header configurations to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact information.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing clear company contact details including emails and phone numbers on the website.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy incorporating continuous monitoring and compliance checks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feratel
Description
Tourisme et marketing au plus haut niveau: nous proposons des solutions globales complètes et conçues individuellement pour un tourisme fort à valeur ajoutée.
Key services
Marketing solutions, Upselling, Service, Data strategy, Communication, Interfaces
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, JavaScript, CSS, Cookiebot
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Usercentrics GmbH
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses TYPO3 CMS and modern cookie consent management.
  3. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations.
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed cookie categories and providers.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Multiple language versions and regional domains indicate international presence.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  9. No certifications or compliance badges visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and extensible content management system suitable for enterprise use. It uses modern web technologies including asynchronous JavaScript loading and responsive CSS stylesheets for mobile optimization. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple CSS assets optimized for different screen sizes, indicating attention to performance and user experience. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph properties. The technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced by adding security headers and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feratel.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feratel.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.